We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Regulated tenant not all she might be
Comments
-
Some landlords are criminals too, Rachman, Mark Fortune, Beds in sheds landlords, etc. That dutch nutter.The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0 -
I know court records don't list tenancies at all. so no point in looking at them, you are just making stuff up.The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0 -
So we go on, and it has nothing whatever to do with the discussion in hand really.
Court records do not record whether someone is a tenant or not, but it is inevitable that some are and some are not.
Consequently there are both dishonest tenants and dishonest landlords.
So what? The intention of starting this thread was to find an intelligent and just soloution to a very real problem. We have not even brushed against such a thing.0 -
ancientbuilding wrote: »The intention of starting this thread was to find an intelligent and just soloution to a very real problem. We have not even brushed against such a thing.
So you haven't read post 10 or 12 then.Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold"; if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn0 -
So why did you make irrelevant statements about some tenants being criminals? Do you just like posting drivel or were you looking for sympathy?ancientbuilding wrote: »So we go on, and it has nothing whatever to do with the discussion in hand really.
Court records do not record whether someone is a tenant or not, but it is inevitable that some are and some are not.
Consequently there are both dishonest tenants and dishonest landlords.
So what? The intention of starting this thread was to find an intelligent and just soloution to a very real problem. We have not even brushed against such a thing.
Because if you were it's in the dictionary somewhere in between shït and syphilis.The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head. Terry Pratchett
http.thisisnotalink.cöm0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards