aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

k12479

I actually entered your thread to provide something of an answer to your question, which others largely concurred with.

Your rather strange viewpoint on such things then emerged and it would seem most other people commenting also find your views rather deluded. As every country on earth has limitations on who can enter, for how long and for what purposes, then it would seem that most countries also believe your viewpoint to be deluded.

peachyprice

k12479 wrote: »

So, clearly you bring nothing of any value, just deluded, idealistic views on 'free movement' and 'fundamental human rights'.

A bit like this thread really.

It's not really a question is it, it's just OP sounding off and spreading his anti-immigration law propaganda.

balletshoes

OP have you thought about contacting the immigration authorities of the Turks and Caicos, and ask them why?

Freedom to travel as a basic human right - lovely. Human rights legislation doesn't stipulate travelling to different countries regardless of immigration law though does it? Travel could just be from your town to the next town, that counts, no?

I think you just started this thread to have an argument - and the regular posters on this thread who have replied to you are not anti-immigration as far as I'm aware (and I'm certainly not, I have lived and worked outside the EU, my husband is from outside the EU, and he now lives and works here in the UK).