We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Anyone have an idea of what Youtube considers a hit on a video?
martin57
Posts: 774 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
Hi folks,
Just wondering does anyone have an idea of what Youtube considers a hit on a video.
I know that they don't publicise the criteria in case of missuse, but surely its not as stringent as one hit per ip address?
Thanks
martin57
Just wondering does anyone have an idea of what Youtube considers a hit on a video.
I know that they don't publicise the criteria in case of missuse, but surely its not as stringent as one hit per ip address?
Thanks
martin57
0
Comments
-
Isnt it based on views?0
-
Thanks for reply, that's what I mean, what do they consider to be a particular view or hit as I believe they are known?
martin570 -
I'd guess at something like a play of more than a certain percentage of the file per IP address per time period, none of which they publicise. That would block spam and page refreshes from misconnections but still register if you liked a video enough to rewatch it a few days later0
-
Hi folks,
Just wondering does anyone have an idea of what Youtube considers a hit on a video.
I know that they don't publicise the criteria in case of missuse, but surely its not as stringent as one hit per ip address?
Thanks
martin57
Hi martin
It's a very closely guarded secret - if you look around the net, you will see that lots of people have tried to 'reverse engineer' the criteria and algorithms.
I suspect the criteria evolve over time - both to make the view count more 'meaningful', and to block any loopholes/abuse that emerges.
It seems that as well as blocking loopholes when they find them, they will also retrospectively reduce view counts. See: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/29/fake-youtube-views-cut-google-audit_n_2380848.html0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards