PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! However well-intentioned, for the safety of other users we ask that you refrain from seeking or offering medical advice. This includes recommendations for medicines, procedures or over-the-counter remedies. Posts or threads found to be in breach of this rule will be removed.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

eat well for less?

Options
2

Comments

  • RHemmings
    RHemmings Posts: 4,894 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The BBC had a television programme 'Eat Well for Less'. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0377vn8/Eat_Well_for_Less/

    I was disappointed with it. I thought that they had a surprisingly few tricks up their sleeves in terms of eating well for less, and mainly concentrated on finding 'basics' food products that matched normal products in taste tests. They found, e.g. that some basics foods were bland, but didn't seem to think of jazzing some of these ups with added spice, or creative use in cooking. And they had very little on cooking things from scratch.
  • joedenise
    joedenise Posts: 17,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I was also really disappointed with the programme. I thought it was going to be showing people how to "eat better for less" - and it certainly wasn't that at all!

    This was another of those BBC programmes where they could have done so much but actually didn't do anything to help anyone. Such a pity to have wasted the time and money making the programme and wasting the viewers time as well watching it.

    Denise
  • siegemode
    siegemode Posts: 384 Forumite
    100 Posts
    fairtrade wrote: »
    In the blind taste test the cheapest supermarket sauce came second to the expensive homemade version. So for convenience and cost saving you would probably buy that.
    It can often be the case that something homemade, especially if it is one-off, is much less cost effective than a ready made version.

    This may be true but sometimes it is more important to know and understand the ingredients and go for a healthy hm option which has the nutritional benefits of fresh ingredients. Cheapest is not the only important factor. We can all eat cheap, but eating healthy should be the important factor. The programme was titled Eat Well For Less and I for one expected a focus on healthy and low cost as opposed to cheap or tastes better.
  • miss_scrooge
    miss_scrooge Posts: 421 Forumite
    The titles misleading surprised it was about convenince foods never learnt anything new still an interesting to watch though.
  • fairtrade
    fairtrade Posts: 476 Forumite
    siegemode wrote: »
    sometimes it is more important to know and understand the ingredients and go for a healthy hm option

    I don't disagree with the sentiment. What I really meant was if it not subtantially or nutrionally different then there is nothing wrong with the cheap option.
    I always ask myself, can I make it and if I do make it are there any benefits in doing so? One example would be muesli - oats, malt and dried fruit. It is cheaper for me to make it myself than buy pre-prepared and nutrionally it is just as good.
    For myself I am an optimist - there does not seem to be much use being anything else.
    Sir Winston Churchill
  • fuddle
    fuddle Posts: 6,823 Forumite
    Just caught up on this this afternoon.

    It was entertainment, and I use the word loosely, only for me. I was very disappointed. Why do we have to have programes that are competition based and edited around gimicky ideas? I learned nothing about preparing anything I saw on there, cemented what I already did know and taste tests like that? Pointless as everyone's palette is different - if you're used to Lidl tomato sauce that is going to be the yummy one, no?

    The Cost Of Living Season was something I was very excited for, thought I may be educated but no, it's a whole host of programmes surrounding prejudice and stereotypes, in my opinion anyway.

    The B.eeb could have done so much better.
  • siegemode
    siegemode Posts: 384 Forumite
    100 Posts
    fairtrade wrote: »
    I don't disagree with the sentiment. What I really meant was if it not subtantially or nutrionally different then there is nothing wrong with the cheap option.
    I always ask myself, can I make it and if I do make it are there any benefits in doing so? One example would be muesli - oats, malt and dried fruit. It is cheaper for me to make it myself than buy pre-prepared and nutrionally it is just as good.

    Sorry if I came across moody, I had just watched this and the other programme and was feeling a little wound up !
    fuddle wrote: »
    Just caught up on this this afternoon.

    It was entertainment, and I use the word loosely, only for me. I was very disappointed. Why do we have to have programes that are competition based and edited around gimicky ideas? I learned nothing about preparing anything I saw on there, cemented what I already did know and taste tests like that? Pointless as everyone's palette is different - if you're used to Lidl tomato sauce that is going to be the yummy one, no?

    The Cost Of Living Season was something I was very excited for, thought I may be educated but no, it's a whole host of programmes surrounding prejudice and stereotypes, in my opinion anyway.

    The B.eeb could have done so much better.


    Totally agree :)
  • 5555tt
    5555tt Posts: 108 Forumite
    Interesting
  • redfox
    redfox Posts: 15,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hi, Martin’s asked me to post this in these circumstances: I’ve asked Board Guides to move threads if they’ll receive a better response elsewhere (please see this rule) so this post/thread has been moved to another board, where it should get more replies. If you have any questions about this policy please email [EMAIL="forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com"]forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com[/EMAIL].
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I though it was rubbish. None of them could stick to the individual budget. Sticking to the budget for a lot of people was much easier because they had a bigger lump sum and therefore more buying power.

    Also, once they stocked up thir cupboards for them, which was nice, they will run out of that food before long and be back in their original position....

    The chickens were a good idea though, they'll last a lot longer than 4 pints of milk.

    I was thinking, why don't you tell them to go tot he library, use the internet, and find a girl called Jacks blog :)

    Oops, I'm on the wrong programme :)
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.