We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
RBS loanguard PPI on mortgage
justjohn
Posts: 2,260 Forumite
RBS loanguard PPI on mortgage
Seem aprox 1994 onwards RBS was doing mortgages. Packaged with RBS Loanguard PPI.
I had one of these mortgages and like many was told PPI was compulsory.
I remember at the time querying it with the RBS adviser. I also remember wondering why there was a PPI option box on the Mortgage application if it was compulsory.
Has anyone attempted to claim this back?
Seem aprox 1994 onwards RBS was doing mortgages. Packaged with RBS Loanguard PPI.
I had one of these mortgages and like many was told PPI was compulsory.
I remember at the time querying it with the RBS adviser. I also remember wondering why there was a PPI option box on the Mortgage application if it was compulsory.
Has anyone attempted to claim this back?
0
Comments
-
Seem aprox 1994 onwards RBS was doing mortgages. Packaged with RBS Loanguard PPI.
That was actually common with a number of lenders in the mid 90s.I had one of these mortgages and like many was told PPI was compulsory.
Well it would be if it was a packaged deal.I remember at the time querying it with the RBS adviser. I also remember wondering why there was a PPI option box on the Mortgage application if it was compulsory.
The same mortgage applications were used for packaged deals and non-packaged deals.Has anyone attempted to claim this back?
You haven't given any valid reasons for complaint. The compulsory issue only exists if the policy wasnt actually required. Where it was required, then it is not a mis-sale. Packaged deals are allowed.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Well that's fine but was also told at the time it could be canceled after one year. ( so does not seem that compulsory lol )
Thing is, I was not told that I could use other PPI providers. However I was told that I could use other building insurance providers other than direct line(rbs insurance).
Seems a bit iffy looking back on it now.
As for reasons for mis-sale it was not needed as my wife was an NHS employee and would have been on good sick pay.
How do I find out if it was a package deal. actually compulsory?0 -
Well that's fine but was also told at the time it could be canceled after one year. ( so does not seem that compulsory lol )
That was exactly what the deals were. It does make purchase compulsory.Thing is, I was not told that I could use other PPI providers.
That is because it was a packaged deal. They were not making it a lending decision. You were buying a deal with a certain rate as long as you bought the insurance product through them.Seems a bit iffy looking back on it now.
Nothing wrong with it at all.As for reasons for mis-sale it was not needed as my wife was an NHS employee and would have been on good sick pay.
A good reason with loan and credit card PPI but fails on two counts with MPPI.
1 - the FOS have been rejecting complaints on MPPI with 6 months full pay/6 months half pay as mortgages are long term and MPPI typically pays out in addition to employer benefits
2 - it was compulsory to have it.How do I find out if it was a package deal. actually compulsory?
Look at your paperwork. However, as I said, it was very common from around 1993 to around 1998 with some going on as long as early 2000s. You dont see it much nowadays. The one year tie in for the insurance was a common term.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards