We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Unfair Dismissal??
unclebuck79
Posts: 8 Forumite
Hello.
I was recently made redundant along with 150+ co-workers by a large construction firm in the utilities sector. Our firm started a 45 consultation period at the beginning of April and has just got around to making us redundant. The selection process was a points based system, where employees were given points for skills, disciplinary record, driving license and availability to work on-call. The remainder of the points were given on a question & answer session, with only text book answers containing key words gaining maximum points. There were 3 question papers in total covering 4 Employee groups ;
1 : Employee group 1
2 : Employee group 2
3 : Employee group 3 & 4
Every employee from each group was called to the yard individually over a period of approx 15 days, 4-5 days per question paper. Every employee from group 1 were asked the same questions, as so group 2, and finally group 3 & 4 were asked the same questions as each other. I was in Employee group 4 and when I was made redundant I raised the issue that the questions could have been relayed over the course of the 4-5 days, giving an unfair advantage/disadvantage to certain employees. The senior manager and HR rep`s defence was "Why would anybody inform others of the questions and risk putting their own job in jeapordy?"
I found this comment unbelievable, I has just lost my job, and could see a glaring hole in the selection process, and they come out with a comment which basically is saying people shouldn`t talk about the questions. Another flaw in his statement, is that an employee from Employee group 3 could tell his mate from Employee group 4 the questions, as the questions were the same but they would be pooled into different tables, therefor helping out a friend and not risking his own standing in his table.
Any help or guidance on if this is common practice or could be classed as unfair selection/dismissal would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance, Stuart.
I was recently made redundant along with 150+ co-workers by a large construction firm in the utilities sector. Our firm started a 45 consultation period at the beginning of April and has just got around to making us redundant. The selection process was a points based system, where employees were given points for skills, disciplinary record, driving license and availability to work on-call. The remainder of the points were given on a question & answer session, with only text book answers containing key words gaining maximum points. There were 3 question papers in total covering 4 Employee groups ;
1 : Employee group 1
2 : Employee group 2
3 : Employee group 3 & 4
Every employee from each group was called to the yard individually over a period of approx 15 days, 4-5 days per question paper. Every employee from group 1 were asked the same questions, as so group 2, and finally group 3 & 4 were asked the same questions as each other. I was in Employee group 4 and when I was made redundant I raised the issue that the questions could have been relayed over the course of the 4-5 days, giving an unfair advantage/disadvantage to certain employees. The senior manager and HR rep`s defence was "Why would anybody inform others of the questions and risk putting their own job in jeapordy?"
I found this comment unbelievable, I has just lost my job, and could see a glaring hole in the selection process, and they come out with a comment which basically is saying people shouldn`t talk about the questions. Another flaw in his statement, is that an employee from Employee group 3 could tell his mate from Employee group 4 the questions, as the questions were the same but they would be pooled into different tables, therefor helping out a friend and not risking his own standing in his table.
Any help or guidance on if this is common practice or could be classed as unfair selection/dismissal would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance, Stuart.
0
Comments
-
Maybe getting the answers from a "friend" demonstrates initiative, which is a trait they are looking for?0
-
Doesnt help the people in first does it?
Are you being serious????0 -
Surely should have been 90 days consultation anyway.0
-
superbigal36 wrote: »Surely should have been 90 days consultation anyway.
Sorry wrong there. The consulation period was reduced to 45 days from the 6th April 20130
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards