Katie Hopkins

ap1986

Pollycat wrote: »

I doubt very much if she actually holds half of the views she debates in favour of in the media. :cool:

Well then she's even more of a moron!!

paulineb_2

I read this earlier in the year

Shes bonkers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2281959/Apprentice-star-Katie-Hopkins-admits-I-wont-let-children-play-friends-I-deem-beneath-them.html

hunters

I read on her twitter feed that she says its not a class war, too true, the woman has no class at all.

Funky_Bold_Ribena

What sort of parent lets their skanky kids leap all over furniture with their shoes on? Katie skanky Hopkins obviously. Yuk.

paulineb wrote: »

I read this earlier in the year

Shes bonkers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2281959/Apprentice-star-Katie-Hopkins-admits-I-wont-let-children-play-friends-I-deem-beneath-them.html

Pollycat

ap1986 wrote: »

Well then she's even more of a moron!!

Maybe so - but a moron with a probably lucrative career in annoying people on TV with her outrageous views.

It's all about the money. :rotfl:

RuthnJasper

paulineb wrote: »

I read this earlier in the year

Shes bonkers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2281959/Apprentice-star-Katie-Hopkins-admits-I-wont-let-children-play-friends-I-deem-beneath-them.html

In that article, not ONCE is there any mention of the father (or fathers) of these poor tots whose lives are so dominated by their overweening mother. Is HE allowed any say in the matter (if he/they are even on the scene)?

The silly woman is building up a big reserve of trouble for herself - the internet isn't going to go away; and one day the children will be old enough to read these articles and she what she has done to them. (If she isn't storing all the clippings in a "Memory Book" for each of her kids, telling them how she 'saved' them from 'unsuitable friends'). What are the odds that her children are going to strongly rebel against her clutches when they hit puberty...?

Norman Bates springs to mind... "Mother!!" :eek:

NBLondon

Pollycat wrote: »

She airs her outrageous views because she knows that it will stimulate debate and she'll get asked back on, giving her more money in her pocket.

Which was why she was on The Apprentice in the first place, methinks.

I predict Luiza from the current series will be competing with her in a few years.

Foxn86

I do wonder what India, poppy and Maximillion ( lovely names might I add *roll eyes*), will think of their upper class mother being caught in a field with a married man. infact she had affairs which all resulted in divorces with 3 married men.

On top of that one failed marriage and kids by different men, not that there's any issues with that. By my god think she forgets she is rather on the opposite side of classy !

And if I look like that at 38 years of age I would be more concerned with finding a plastic surgeon than worrying about childs name.

All fur coat and no knickers spring to mind !!!!!

paulineb_2

Most of the female "writers" who write for the Daily Mail, Samantha Brick, Shona Sibary, come across in much the same way, no issues about putting their family in the headlines.

I dont know much about Katie Hopkins, I dont watch the apprentice, but I do know who she is and I remember she got a lot of press for having an affair with someone, might have been her boss, they were papped snogging in a field in a state of undress as I recall.

Shes just attention seeking and she'll say anything to stay in the headlines.

If I did buy the Mail Id be using those articles to line my cats litter trays.
Anyone who listens to those daft bints views on anything needs their heads examined.

battleborn

I Think alot of white middle class parents would have a problem if there daughter came home with a new boyfriend that was muslim with a long beard and was a strict follower of Allah, that also hated the British governement.

However you cant say it, as you would be called a racist or a hater.