NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.
MSE News: 'Bullying' bank ordered to pay up for harassing customer: Know your rights

2.4K Posts
"Bank of Scotland has been ordered to compensate a customer for harassment after making 547 calls to recover a debt..."
Read the full story:
'Bullying' bank ordered to pay up for harassing customer: Know your rights

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
'Bullying' bank ordered to pay up for harassing customer: Know your rights

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
Do we know what portion that was, please?
i.e. how much did it end up costing Ms Roberts to get her £7500 damages?
Court of appeal? - doesn't sound like legal costs would be low.
Edit: another view on events given here:
http://www.allpaylegal.com/news/roberts-v-bank-scotland-plc-and-another-appeal-12062013
It appears in Ms Roberts attempts to obtain her £7,500 damages, she gave up the right to a 'drop hands' offer (she ignored such an offer made twice by the bank)
As a result, the £10k counterclaim by the bank was eventually upheld.
But she did manage to get her name in print which the 'drop hands' offer would probably have prevented as it included a confidentiality clause.
If this were me, I think I'd feel as though I'd lost a shilling and found a sixpence. But I presume Ms Roberts is happy with the outcome she achieved.
Sounds very much like it, doesn't it.
Bank charges are not illegal, regardless of your family circumstances. Banks do - and have to - publish the exact details of their charges.
Well, that's an original argument...
Anyway, yeah, bank charges aren't illegal. "Explaining" this "fact" doesn't make them go away.
~~joosy jeezus~~
Runner up to "my dogs are related to the Queen's corgies, therefore I am exempt from TV licence"
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2013/06/18/my-dogs-related-to-the-queens-corgi-brits-top-tv-tax-excuses/
Yes, of course they do. All the exact details.
I think what the poster meant is that they wanted some sympathy during a difficult time.
She had a bank loan with them. When she died, I notified them and said that as soon as I had probate, I'd pay the loan off, but until then there was nothing I could do as all her bank accounts were frozen.
They bombarded me with increasingly threatening letters and phone calls. Threatening to take me to court, threatening to ruin my credit score etc. I wrote to BoS to complain and was told that they wouldn't contact me again until I was in a position to pay, but the phone calls carried on.
They're scum as far as I'm concerned.
How long was this torment going on for? Sounds like a rather long time.
I think as excutor you only have 6 months to get things sorted out, otherwise you may become personally liable for any undue delay.