We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Employers Best candidate
Comments
-
its not a question of cant be bothered
http://www.bernsteincenterforvisualperformance.com/eye-movement-problems-oculomotor-dysfunction-or-omd
alot of people have this and dont know about it
Sorry - but I think the ratio of 'not bothered' vs 'oculomotor dysfunction' would be rather a high one in this situation.
And if you do have trouble reading, you ask someone to help, particularly on something as important as a CV0 -
exactly we dont check
But why should I at this point, if I am employing someone they need to sell themselves to me, they need to be able to use a program on a computer to get spelling correct. Its not hard.Don't trust a forum for advice. Get proper paid advice. Any advice given should always be checked0 -
The bottom line is that employers choose the person they think is best for the job. If they have qualified candidates available who have excellent written communication skills, why would they choose someone who doesn't have those skills?
Communication is a very important part of most of jobs (with the exception of menial and labour roles) and poor written communication skills can make you appear unprofessional and mean that you don't represent your employer in the way they would like.
If you know your skills aren't up to scratch then you really take your time over applications, use spell check and get someone to proof read for you (to pick up errors like confusing their/there etc) otherwise your application will end up at the bottom of the pile. If you haven't put the effort in to your CV/application form (which is supposed to be you showing yourself at your best) then employers won't think you'll do better if they give you the job.
Also, every time we choose one thing over another we are discriminating. Discrimination is only illegal if it is based on protected characteristics (race, sexuality, gender, disability etc). Having poor written communication skills (if not caused by an underlying disability) is not a protected characteristic.Common sense?...There's nothing common about sense!0 -
browneyedbazzi wrote: »The bottom line is that employers choose the person they think is best for the job. If they have qualified candidates available who have excellent written communication skills, why would they choose someone who doesn't have those skills?
Communication is a very important part of most of jobs (with the exception of menial and labour roles) and poor written communication skills can make you appear unprofessional and mean that you don't represent your employer in the way they would like.
If you know your skills aren't up to scratch then you really take your time over applications, use spell check and get someone to proof read for you (to pick up errors like confusing their/there etc) otherwise your application will end up at the bottom of the pile. If you haven't put the effort in to your CV/application form (which is supposed to be you showing yourself at your best) then employers won't think you'll do better if they give you the job.
Also, every time we choose one thing over another we are discriminating. Discrimination is only illegal if it is based on protected characteristics (race, sexuality, gender, disability etc). Having poor written communication skills (if not caused by an underlying disability) is not a protected characteristic.
Disability is quite a harsh word but yes it quite clearly is for some people
Not everyone fits in a box0 -
I know when faced with hundreds of CVs that all look almost exactly the same, there really isn't much else to go on! They have to be whittled down somehow. I personally prefer an application form with questions specific to the job, so there's a lot more to go on.0
-
i started work in a stock control department and found a few of the staff didnt know what decimal points were or what minus signs meant . But we dont see the same discrimination against people who cant add up it just accepted .
I worked in an accounting department, a significantly amount of people could not tell you how to work out the net amount if you were only given gross. I was genuinely shocked that people were challenging me and 'wanted to check on their excel calculator' they use.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards