We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Standard Life - How much will my policy be worth tomorrow?
Options
Comments
-
It's a question of risk and reward: on something as important as your home, you want a suitable reward for taking a risk that you won't be able to pay off the loan by using the endowment.
Was passion8's reward adequate to compensate him for the real worry that he experienced of a shortfall?
Looking back, would he have preferred to pay a bit more for the security of a repayment mortgage?
Only he can say.Trying to keep it simple...0 -
EdInvestor wrote: »It's a question of risk and reward: on something as important as your home, you want a suitable reward for taking a risk that you won't be able to pay off the loan by using the endowment.
Was passion8's reward adequate to compensate him for the real worry that he experienced of a shortfall?
Looking back, would he have preferred to pay a bit more for the security of a repayment mortgage?
Only he can say.
I'm more worried about my apparent gender change EdInvestor
Seriously, and this is advice to anyone reading - read the small print! Or get advice.
We (husband and myself) are notorious for being lax with money-related things, and not doing what I suggested above ...and that's asking for advice, free or otherwise. (We're just trying to work out our mortage, and I wouldn't even know where to start with asking advice regarding that one)
We're not doing cartwheels about the forecast, but we are happy that it's reached its target and paid a little extra - it could have been much worse imo.
Thanks for the post !!!!!! thereOh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. ~ Sir Walter Scott0 -
Hi again
As it is a new month tomorrow, I thought I'd dig out this thread in readiness for my monthly update. Great to see another SL policy returning a surplus
Don't forget the free shares passion8 :beer:
My endowment was sold to me when inflation was somewhat higher than in recent years. If it had continued at the higher levels, I guess that a £30K surplus would be 'worth' closer to the actual surplus that passion8 is expecting.
Ok, it is not great but it could have been so much worse.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
1st April's figures (last month in brackets):
Basic value.........£21,375.72...(£21,292.14)
Final Bonus...........£4,435.47....(£4,322.31)
Total plan value...£25,811.19...(£25,614.45)
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
So in less than a year - going back to your OP George - your policy has gone up by £3k for an outlay of £500, roughly. What does Ed make of that, I wonder ?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
See post no 20 and following for my views on GG's policy.Trying to keep it simple...0
-
EdInvestor wrote: »If you took the surrender value and used the money to reduce the loan @6.49% and increased the mortgage payment by the endowment premium to maturity, your total return would be 31,775, higher than the target i believe?
Doing the same with the BTL mortgage would result in a return of 31,906.
Obviously these are guaranteed returns, no risk involved.
But you are assuming Ed that the target on GG's policy is the maximum that it could pay out. In reality, it could pay out more or less. That is the risk, I agree, but you present it as taking a risk with no chance of winning.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
!!!!!!_here wrote: »So in less than a year - going back to your OP George - your policy has gone up by £3k for an outlay of £500, roughly. What does Ed make of that, I wonder ?Not quite right but, excluding the premiums, I make it an annual return of 10.79% - tax free! That's equivalent to 17.6% for a higher rate tax payer. That return came with some risk and it could have gone down. With under two years to maturity, now might be a good time to bail out.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
!!!!!!_here wrote: »But you are assuming Ed that the target on GG's policy is the maximum that it could pay out.
Not at all. I am making a judgement about what the SL with profits fund is likely to pay out, given its investment mix, the 20% tax levied on the returns and the deduction for life cover. In GG's case there may be some LAPR tax relief, which would mean his performance would be better than this.
A key factor with SL endowments though is the loss of the free assets, which has devastated terminal bonuses over the past 4 years, meaning that very few policies will reach their target.In reality, it could pay out more or less. That is the risk, I agree.
That is sadly the case with many endowments these days.Trying to keep it simple...0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote: »[snipped]
Don't forget the free shares passion8 :beer:but thanks for the reminder.:beer:
And good luck and best wishes with whatever you decide to do with your endowmentOh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive. ~ Sir Walter Scott0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards