We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PPI Help/Question
sheerluckholmes
Posts: 4 Newbie
in Credit cards
Hello all,
I had a credit card with MBNA for some time. It looks like I will be getting back an amount (not yet disclosed) of PPI, mainly on the basis I have a pre-existing illness that stops me from being covered on most forms of insurance - even when I have gone to take life/sickness/critical illness cover I have had to pay more in premiums than my Wife to receive LESS cover.
Anyway...
Had a card with MBNA, looks like I'll be getting some PPI back.
My question relates though to the fact that I had to pay back extra on the card for going over the limit. I went over the limit when MBNA lowered the limit to less than what I owed due to missing payments. Is it reasonable to argue that had I not had been charged PPI then I would have owed less / had more money to pay back the debt and therefore not had to pay as much back?
Is there any kind of case or precedent for this?
Thank for any help in advance.
SLH
I had a credit card with MBNA for some time. It looks like I will be getting back an amount (not yet disclosed) of PPI, mainly on the basis I have a pre-existing illness that stops me from being covered on most forms of insurance - even when I have gone to take life/sickness/critical illness cover I have had to pay more in premiums than my Wife to receive LESS cover.
Anyway...
Had a card with MBNA, looks like I'll be getting some PPI back.
My question relates though to the fact that I had to pay back extra on the card for going over the limit. I went over the limit when MBNA lowered the limit to less than what I owed due to missing payments. Is it reasonable to argue that had I not had been charged PPI then I would have owed less / had more money to pay back the debt and therefore not had to pay as much back?
Is there any kind of case or precedent for this?
Thank for any help in advance.
SLH
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards