We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

List of Dividend Paying Shares

13»

Comments

  • redbuzzard
    redbuzzard Posts: 718 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ark_Welder wrote: »
    However, it is one thing to make assumptions about an individual's intentions, but quite another to provide answers based upon those assumptions, which may have no bearing on the reason for the question being asked.

    The OP may very well be intending to buy high-yielding shares rather than shares with a yield - that is what I assumed, and is also is the specific reason why I did not sort the lists of companies and their yields into order before providing the links. But it is the links that, hopefully, answer their question. Whereas suggesting that they do something that is based on an assumption, may not.

    Let's try and answer what is being asked rather than giving answers to what has not been asked.

    Gosh, sorry.

    It's just a discussion point isn't it? My post to which you object was a response to Big Freddie's apparently puzzled comment on Flock's suggestion of equity income.

    I still think it's a reasonable idea for Flock to raise in response to a question about shares that pay dividends, whether it involves an assumption (which I acknowledged) or not.

    Your reply to the OP with the link was a perfectly good answer of course, of which I implied no criticism.
    "Things are never so bad they can't be made worse" - Humphrey Bogart
  • Ark_Welder
    Ark_Welder Posts: 1,878 Forumite
    redbuzzard wrote: »
    Gosh, sorry.

    It's just a discussion point isn't it? My post to which you object was a response to Big Freddie's apparently puzzled comment on Flock's suggestion of equity income.

    I still think it's a reasonable idea for Flock to raise in response to a question about shares that pay dividends, whether it involves an assumption (which I acknowledged) or not.

    Your reply to the OP with the link was a perfectly good answer of course, of which I implied no criticism.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep#Flock_behavior
    Living for tomorrow might mean that you survive the day after.
    It is always different this time. The only thing that is the same is the outcome.
    Portfolios are like personalities - one that is balanced is usually preferable.



  • wolfma
    wolfma Posts: 10 Forumite
    Thanks to all that replied.

    I was looking for a dividend company list as I am looking to buy shares in dividend paying companies which have large upside potential. Hence, ideally I was looking for stuff outside the FTSE 100.

    The digitallook links and that upcomingdividends site was exactly the type of thing I was looking for. Thanks for the links.
  • I bought the Financial Times last Saturday and as you would expect there's a wealth of info there especially in the foreign markets which many websites ignore. Look down the european listings and you will find many household names which bear good yields. Beware distractions though.... I'm very interested in putting an offer in for a 1700 acre estate in Scotland which was in the FT's property pages... I'm about £7,800,000 short off the £8m asking price...
    Solar PV cost £5760 (15/03/13)
    FIT inc + Electricity saved £3746 (65% Paid back) Tax free
    Last update 30/09/17
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    redbuzzard wrote: »
    Up to a point, Lord Copper.

    Flat dividends in money terms can point to a declining situation - the company doesn't want to cut the divi unless it has to, so pushes the figures to maintain earnings cover and maintain it - the corollary is that they will avoid booking bad news if they can, and will have emptied every drawer and cupboard for anything they have squirrelled away or overlooked in previous years to maximise the reported profit.

    There's no one indicator of a solid dividend but lots of things add up to a picture. Look at the cash flow, bearing in mind it's a function of investment as well as op costs and revenues.

    Of course what you can't see in the accounts is unreported events after the last filing. Always check news, regulatory announcements, and read trading statements carefully and between the lines - what's missing, or fudged? Those statements aren't statutory in format so they are easiest to massage - a bit like fund performance in brochures!

    You make some very good points Mr Salter ;)
    All I am saying is that they cannot say they have paid more dividends than they have actually paid.
    But they can say they have made more earnings than they have actually made. (Typically by over valuing intangible assets like Goodwill, then eventually writing them down as 'exceptional items' when they can maintain the pretense no longer.)
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.