We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Environmental Protection visit - URGENT HELP NEEDED!
Comments
-
All this is completely true, and totally irrelevant I'm afraid. You've almost certainly dropped your landlord in it, you've almost certainly annoyed him, and as a result he's likely to terminate your tenancy at the earliest opportunity. Who's fault it is doesn't matter, he's within his rights to seek possession once August arrives and I can't see how he'd be liable for compensation in any way.
In all fairness, the LL has dropped himself in it! I'm positive that any in-discrepancies with building regs would have been identified eventually. It's just unfortunate that, because of my harmless complaint (which I had every right to pursue) it has led to a full investigation into the requirements he has purposely avoided.
I appreciate your advice.0 -
The LL does owe the tenant a duty of care, however.
By letting a flat that doesn't comply with regs, then adding a noise nuisance, a claim for compo could be submitted, around the distress created by LL failing to ensure "quiet enjoyment".
That could be topped-up with a claim of reckless deception by LL letting a property that was non-compliant to regs, so OP could claim restitution which could be refund of all rent paid0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards