We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bishop Bashes Boomers

11516171820

Comments

  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    I think Ill give up as I have I've no idea what's being talked about anymore.

    I thought Olly was inferring that residential mortgages are cross subsidised by related residential products (e.g. life, house, car, holiday insurances etc) which may not apply to BTL.

    I am not so sure that mortgages are subsidised BTL or personal/residential. The term /amounts/rates being large in realtion to the "added" benefits that might accrue. Many mortgages have arrangement, legal costs and early termination costs that provide the icing.

    Years ago I am sure there was some benefit derived from endowment cross sales commission - it quite probably made more in some cases.before the advent of larger arrangement fees etc.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I am not so sure that mortgages are subsidised BTL or personal/residential. The term /amounts/rates being large in realtion to the "added" benefits that might accrue. Many mortgages have arrangement, legal costs and early termination costs that provide the icing.

    Years ago I am sure there was some benefit derived from endowment cross sales commission - it quite probably made more in some cases.before the advent of larger arrangement fees etc.

    Well, that would bring me back to the proposition that, as BTL mortgages have a lower level of arrears than residential mortgage, one would expect the interest rate to be lower for BTL
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 18 June 2013 at 7:59PM
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Well, that would bring me back to the proposition that, as BTL mortgages have a lower level of arrears than residential mortgage, one would expect the interest rate to be lower for BTL

    I was pointing out that the banks are there to make profit.

    This is one of the important points Martin always goes on about when he's doing his money talks.

    If you ran a bank why would you give a business customer who isn't as highly regulated by the financial authorities for your mortgage products like your consumer clients lower interest rates when you don't have to? You wouldn't especially if your competitors aren't.

    Also remember the government interferes with the consumer market.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    ukcarper wrote: »
    Do you know what % of BTL mortgages are in arrears.
    AIUI around 1%.

    Link posted earlier to FSA figures shows arrears on BTL at 1.58% compared to 1.08% for 'standard' mortgages.

    http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/specialist-mortgages/buy-to-let/news/fsa-reveals-extent-of-buy-to-let-arrears/1008179.article
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    antrobus wrote: »
    Link posted earlier to FSA figures shows arrears on BTL at 1.58% compared to 1.08% for 'standard' mortgages.

    http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/specialist-mortgages/buy-to-let/news/fsa-reveals-extent-of-buy-to-let-arrears/1008179.article


    Thanks.

    I took mine from the CML statistics

    http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/media/press/3516.

    I wonder if the % by amount is in the same ball park?
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    edited 18 June 2013 at 9:15PM
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    Well, that would bring me back to the proposition that, as BTL mortgages have a lower level of arrears than residential mortgage, one would expect the interest rate to be lower for BTL


    In the scheme of things I don't suppose the variance is that great.

    Perhaps BTL require a greater degree of risk assessment, monitoring and control?

    Perhaps losses by £amount they are are more by average?

    Historically there may have been a greater proportion of I/O mortgages attracting a premium?

    IMO opinion they shouldn't be cheaper.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 18 June 2013 at 9:44PM
    In the scheme of things I don't suppose the variance is that great.

    Perhaps BTL require a greater degree of risk assessment, monitoring and control?

    Perhaps losses by £amount they are are more by average?

    Historically there may have been a greater proportion of I/O mortgages attracting a premium?

    IMO opinion they shouldn't be cheaper.

    But it goes back to the basic point - banks are there to make money.

    You can make more money out of your customers who aren't as tightly regulated than those that are regardless of the risk.

    If the risks for one group i.e. consumers are more then you need to find another way of making additional money out of them.

    With consumers banks do this by selling products. People, while individuals in different families, are easier to sell additional products like credit cards, building and contents insurance, car insurance, saving accounts and current accounts to than businesses.

    This is due to the fact that the legal entity surrounding a business varies. There as with a consumer the legal entity is always 1-4 individual people.

    Edited to say: Banks do try and sell additional products to businesses. However I know from myself, my own family and other people I know this generally fails. This is due (especially now) to retail banking staff not having a clue about the multitude of business needs.

    They told someone I know when they started their business that they didn't have any start up costs. This person is in a profession where to practise and run your own business you need to be on a register. One requirement of being on that register is that you pay registration fees and have professional indemnity insurance covering you for a few million pounds.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    olly300 wrote: »
    But it goes back to the basic point - banks are there to make money.

    You can make more money out of your customers who aren't as tightly regulated than those that are regardless of the risk.

    If the risks for one group i.e. consumers are more then you need to find another way of making additional money out of them.

    With consumers banks do this by selling products. People, while individuals in different families, are easier to sell additional products like credit cards, building and contents insurance, car insurance, saving accounts and current accounts to than businesses.

    This is due to the fact that the legal entity surrounding a business varies. There as with a consumer the legal entity is always 1-4 individual people.

    Edited to say: Banks do try and sell additional products to businesses. However I know from myself, my own family and other people I know this generally fails. This is due (especially now) to retail banking staff not having a clue about the multitude of business needs.

    They told someone I know when they started their business that they didn't have any start up costs. This person is in a profession where to practise and run your own business you need to be on a register. One requirement of being on that register is that you pay registration fees and have professional indemnity insurance covering you for a few million pounds.


    whether or not banks can make more money from 'unregulated lending' compared to 'regulatd lending' doesn't tell us anything about the relative interest rates.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    olly300 wrote: »
    But it goes back to the basic point - banks are there to make money.

    You can make more money out of your customers who aren't as tightly regulated than those that are regardless of the risk.

    If the risks for one group i.e. consumers are more then you need to find another way of making additional money out of them.

    With consumers banks do this by selling products. People, while individuals in different families, are easier to sell additional products like credit cards, building and contents insurance, car insurance, saving accounts and current accounts to than businesses.

    This is due to the fact that the legal entity surrounding a business varies. There as with a consumer the legal entity is always 1-4 individual people.

    Edited to say: Banks do try and sell additional products to businesses. However I know from myself, my own family and other people I know this generally fails. This is due (especially now) to retail banking staff not having a clue about the multitude of business needs.

    They told someone I know when they started their business that they didn't have any start up costs. This person is in a profession where to practise and run your own business you need to be on a register. One requirement of being on that register is that you pay registration fees and have professional indemnity insurance covering you for a few million pounds.


    I don't disagree with your points.

    I appreciate they have to make money and will endeavour to cross sell their granny these days.

    Whether they are regulate or not I don't really see why business products should be priced at such fine margins as pure residential mortgages, at the bottom end of the market. I appreciate that Medium /Large caps will probably be able to fiance at even cheaper rates possibly

    Residential mortgage products should be restricted to owner occupiers only IMO.

    Your point about not knowing their arris from their elbow is interesting.

    I remember when Bank Managers largely had to pass business, law, accountancy oriented exams and qualify before they were allowed to attain a management roles. They also undertook quasi legal training and financial risk assessment and control. Many built on that knowledge with many years at the coal face building long term relationships with their customers with discretion to make lending decisions locally (up to a point). They were expected to turn a profit and accountable for bad lending.

    Something like 20 years ago that went out the window and sales alone became the driving force. As targets were missed turnover increased and the business knowledge and relationship skills went out the window for all but the larger clients.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    whether or not banks can make more money from 'unregulated lending' compared to 'regulatd lending' doesn't tell us anything about the relative interest rates.


    Do you feel it would be a good idea if they were cheaper than a comparable owner occupier residential mortgage?
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.