We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Where to put my £150 per month? Which tracker funds?

Hi all

At the moment I've got £150 per month to invest into tracker funds. I know it's not very much but at the moment I am concentrating on paying off my mortgage. I want to start investing now so in 3 years when I have more money to invest, I hopefully well have more of a feel for investing. That's my theory anyway!!

Anyway, back to the question, I cant decide whether to invest £50 each into say a FTSE all share tracker, £50 into a north America tracker and £50 into either an Asia excluding Japan or a emerging markets tracker or just put £150 a month into something like Blackrock consensus 100 fund which has a little bit of everything.

Just trying to get an idea on people's opinions on it

I'm in my early 30's so don't mind taking a bit of a risk

Thanks

Comments

  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,796 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Personally I would split 3 ways as you have suggested. If you use a fund supermarket like Cavendish Online then you won't pay any extra platform charges for your investments, at least not at the moment.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,009 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    With a small amount like that I wouldnt look to pick single sector funds but use a portfolio fund.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • smellymel222
    smellymel222 Posts: 69 Forumite
    Thanks for the replys. Anyone else got any opinions?
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Two of the markets you've named are above their long term averages. US and UK. Why not pick places that are down instead of up, so you buy at a cheaper time?

    You might consider the Jupiter Merlin fund range. They make asset allocation decisions and that's of significant use compared to trackers.
  • smellymel222
    smellymel222 Posts: 69 Forumite
    thanks, ive looked at the funds and the only trouble is the higher TER as they are often above 1.5% as opposed to less than 0.5%. since I am only investing small amounts, I didnt want higher costs eating into my money.

    What do people think about this? Should i go for cheaper TER?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,009 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Should i go for cheaper TER?

    If you are compromising investment strategy for the sake of 0.5-0.75% p.a. then you should go with investment strategy (or use a tracker based portfolio fund if you prefer).

    i.e. if your investment strategy costs you long term average of 2.5% pa. then worrying about 0.75% is silly. Better to get strategy right with cost secondary.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • sooty&sweep
    sooty&sweep Posts: 1,316 Forumite
    Hi

    I'm thinking of starting to invest a monthly amount. I'm looking at investing through Hargreaves Lansdown. You can choose to invest in a portfolio of funds selected by them or you can select your own. They have a top 150 funds which they recommend.
    My mum uses them and so far has been pleased.

    Jen
  • Perelandra
    Perelandra Posts: 1,060 Forumite
    jimjames wrote: »
    Personally I would split 3 ways as you have suggested. If you use a fund supermarket like Cavendish Online then you won't pay any extra platform charges for your investments, at least not at the moment.

    For some of the new clean share classes, Fidelity do now charge a platform fee- and Cavendish customers can't escape this. In some cases, the clean version of the fund works out to be more expensive than the retail versions (HSBC trackers being a good example). So, unfortunately, you can now pay higher platform charges overall even through Cavendish.
  • smellymel222
    smellymel222 Posts: 69 Forumite
    Thanks for everyone replys, it's giving me something to think about. That's another thing I am struggling with is what platform to use especially with the way they charge changing over the next year.
  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,642 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But you're not tied to any platform provider for life.

    Once the changes to charges have settled down, you could transfer to a more competitive provider for your particular mix of investments.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.