We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Not fir for purpose
Comments
-
Jamie_Carter wrote: »I presume you have never worked in retail or law, because you have actually contradicted yourself.
No I haven't; it's exactly as unholyangel says ... "acceptance" and "burden of proof" are completely separate entities. In this case the OP has "accepted" the goods by using them. The fact the goods no longer work as intended means "burden of proof" comes into play, insofar as who is obliged to determine the nature of the failure.
So I presume if YOU have worked in retail or law then people who have relied on your knowledge have either lost out, or been lucky to succeed?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards