We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Another Deposit Thread, Sorry!
Comments
-
I'm assuming after 6 weeks you've had your deposit back (minus the amount you mentioned) and it is no longer in a scheme?
If it was me, I'd call their bluff and tell them if they want me to pay it so badly, to take it to small claims court, quoting the fact that it was not noted in your official check-out and you have not had access to the property since to cause any such damage.
If the money is still in a scheme, just dispute the deduction. The dispute will more than likely find in your favour. At this point I'd also ask them to produce bills/detailed breakdowns for the rest of the deductions, just to throw up as much fuss as possible, though it sounds like you already agreed to them, so you probably won't get very far with those anymore.
IMO, whenever it happened, it's their negligence and the bill is on their tab. They're probably just hoping you're going to roll over for them as you have been since you started the tenancy...
P.S. You say the new tenant had been in for a week before it was noticed, so who's to say they didn't brake it. I'm sure they will have had a check-in inventory too, which I bet made no mention of a broken door lock, something I'm sure they would have noticed within the first day of their tenancy...
That's one thing that's annoying me, if they didn't break it the new tenants must have done, so there's 2 different parties trying to take us for mugs! The deposit is still in the scheme as they're now disputing the money for the lock and haven't agreed to give it us back yet.
The tenancy didn't actually end until May 9th as we paid another month so we could move out stress free, well that was the plan anyway, we'd just moved out way before the 9th.
I'll be doing as you suggest and calling their bluff. I'm not going to let the !!!!!!s get away with this one!
Thanks.0 -
In which case you're on firm ground, not noted on check out, so refuse to pay. They will have a very hard battle to win this one..... Good luck !
Thanks! I shall be firm, and not my usual overly-compliant wussy self!
A woman of steel, that's me. Well, more like a tin plating over a core of jellified wimpiness, really, but still...0 -
If it was me, I'd call their bluff and tell them if they want me to pay it so badly, to take it to small claims court, quoting the fact that it was not noted in your official check-out and you have not had access to the property since to cause any such damage.
IMO, whenever it happened, it's their negligence and the bill is on their tab. They're probably just hoping you're going to roll over for them as you have been since you started the tenancy...
P.S. You say the new tenant had been in for a week before it was noticed, so who's to say they didn't brake it. I'm sure they will have had a check-in inventory too, which I bet made no mention of a broken door lock, something I'm sure they would have noticed within the first day of their tenancy...
Couldn't agree more and this is exactly what I would do.
Your liability has ended so tell them to politely "jog on".0 -
Any luck Abbymoo?0
-
No need to get uppity. Well, not just yet.
Your position is: not noted on check-out therefore not chargeable to you. New tenants moved in on 16th so could have developed a fault or been broken since then. So, jog on.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards