We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
would anyone like to discuss the meaning of the following statement?
Comments
-
Plenty of people have offered up data to support my point. You just "simply disagree"
Post 20 makes a vague reference to some kind of figure, and post 26 mentions the unheard-of University of Gronigen.
Apart from that, nothing...
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
Post 20 makes a vague reference to some kind of figure, and post 26 mentions the unheard-of University of Gronigen.
Apart from that, nothing...
TruckerT
And your posts:Yes, but today's poorest 10% probably feel just as hard done by as the poorest 10% felt in 1713.
Richness is not an absolute figure - it's a relative one.
TruckerTYou simply cannot compare 1713 with the present day using numbers.
TruckerTYou might as well try to compare the economy of another planet.
TruckerTHow many wannabe-capitalists would vote in favour of redistributing their diminishing wealth to the third world?
TruckerT
ps - in 1713, the were probably no heaps of rotting food to pick through...I am pleased to offer a challenge to the simplistic views of the majority of this forum's contributors.
TruckerTWhy would I look through the eyes of someone from 1713? Why not 1213? Or 13BC?
I look through the eyes of 2013.
TruckerT
Where's your data?0 -
The thread had quite a lot of reasoned responses until you (and Chewie) resorted to irrelevant personal attacks.
TruckerT
Ah so when you posted,I am pleased to offer a challenge to the simplistic views of the majority of this forum's contributors.
TruckerT
you didn't mean it personally, Good to know.Post 20 makes a vague reference to some kind of figure, and post 26 mentions the unheard-of University of Gronigen.
Apart from that, nothing...
TruckerT
The University of Gronigen is a perfectly respectable academic institution that's been going since 1614. There are lots of things that are 'unheard of', but the Good Lord gave us Google for a reason.0 -
By todays standards even being mega rich in the 1700s would have been a pretty miserable and brutal existence.0
-
PasturesNew wrote: »It's a statement made by some kn0b who thinks slumming it means keeping the Bentley for more than one year and only having 2 main homes and 3 holiday homes.
Looks like the green eyed monster is afoot...
Socialists should work smarter not harder.0 -
All I remember from 1713 is that there was a Treaty of Utrecht and we got Gibraltar
Yes, they were good days.
Some of the other things get a little hazy, but I did drink quite a lot in those days. :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards