We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bank of England upgrades economic growth forecasts
Comments
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Wotsthat has done it in response. I never said what Merv could or couldn't do. My gripe was with their forecasts which even we on here could say wouldn't be anywhere close. We were right. That's not me saying "horrah, well done us" it's me taking issue with the silly forecasts.
Might have to call you on that one Graham. When you said that forecasts wouldn't be anywhere close did you honestly have in your mind an inflation level that was as 'far out' as 0.8%?0 -
Might have to call you on that one Graham. When you said that forecasts wouldn't be anywhere close did you honestly have in your mind an inflation level that was as 'far out' as 0.8%?
You are only talking about this month to evaluate the 4 years I described.
What about when it was 4-5%?
And even if only talking about this month, they forecast it to be around 1% now I believe, hence all the extra QE. You can't talk about their forecasts and then rely on the target.
You have to either talk about the target, or you talk about the forecasts. You can't mix both up to achieve what you want.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »You are only talking about this month to evaluate the 4 years I described.
What about when it was 4-5%?
And even if only talking about this month, they forecast it to be around 1% now I believe, hence all the extra QE. You can't talk about their forecasts and then rely on the target.
You have to either talk about the target, or you talk about the forecasts. You can't mix both up to achieve what you want.
The target is/ was 2.0%, the average under Merv's tenure has been 3.0%.
2.0% is low inflation, 3.0% is low inflation and significantly less than what you were expecting.0 -
The target is/ was 2.0%, the average under Merv's tenure has been 3.0%.
2.0% is low inflation, 3.0% is low inflation and significantly less than what you were expecting.
Sigh. Stop picking and choosing what you are willing to look at!
You have called me on what I talked about. I was talking about the last 4 years.
Mervs tenure has been a lot longer than 4 years. Stop flip flopping around from one statistic to the next and picking your favourite one.0 -
-
OK, try it with a big number, for example - What is 0.8% of the total amount of savings held by UK depositors?It's 40% off target if you're a headline writer with an axe to grind
It's 0.8% off target if you understand how to compare small numbers.
Clue: Halifax quote savers deposits in 2009 UK wide ate around £4000 billion.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Come on Michaels. You know me better than that.
If that's what I was saying, I'd say it, and you wouldn't need to ask "are you saying".
Inflation is running far higher than base rates are, over any period in history that I can think of.
The subtle difference is that base rates are running lower than inflation by choice.
No sane person would be thinking that inflation is a problem at the moment, not least because wage inflation has been consistently lower for the last 3 years.
Anyone who thinks the UK would have had higher exchange rates with higher base rates should look back through the history books - black wednesday in Sept 1992 for starters.US housing: it's not a bubble - Moneyweek Dec 12, 20050
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards