We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PMQs - strange attitude towards redundancy payments - or am I a retard
Comments
-
grizzly1911 wrote: »It may be unacceptable but she is probably right, even though left. Quite possibly a transient phase.
Women of a certain age need to be treated with kid gloves.
How old was Thatch at her height of power?
Don kelvar helmet and body armour and await incoming bombardment, for sexism, rants.
I am far more concerned about the fact that Dianne Abbott is the best person Labour can rustle up to be shadow health secretary. Her use of the word demented doesn't concern me at all (at least in relative terms).0 -
Dictionary.com for retardSlang: Disparaging. a. a mentally !!!!!! person.
b. a person who is stupid, obtuse, or ineffective in some way: a hopeless social retard.
So the OP suggests that he can not understand why someone who leaves an employment prior to a rendundacy payment being made to employees should expect to get the redundancy payment as it would appear to be common sense that a rendundancy payment would only go to those who are made redundant. He also suggests that to him this is so self-evidnet that if he is wrong he must lack a basic level of understanding such as that suffered by someone who is stupid or obtuse.
Who is insulted here?I think....0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »I am far more concerned about the fact that Dianne Abbott is the best person Labour can rustle up to be shadow health secretary.
I thought Andy Burnham is shadow health secretary?0 -
Mr._Pricklepants wrote: »I thought Andy Burnham is shadow health secretary?
I'm sure angry pirate meant shadow public health minister and so did I, honest.0 -
Sorry. My apples for that.chewmylegoff wrote: »I'm sure angry pirate meant shadow public health minister and so did I, honest.
How could I forget Andy Burnham. Labour's front bench are so difficult to forget as they all are so charismatic*.
*As some people find it difficult to detect sarcasm on this forum, I just wanted to clarify that this statement is me being sarcastic. I think the entire Labour party front bench have the charisma of a damp squib. That is not to say the Tories are oozing in it, although they do have marginally more - maybe likened to that of a slightly moist squib.0 -
chewmylegoff wrote: »I'm sure angry pirate meant shadow public health minister and so did I, honest.
I find the word 'shadow' offensive when used to describe Dianne Abbot :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
