We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
An enquiry to the Rent Assessment Committee has led to a tribunal against my wishes..
Comments
-
HellenMellon has posted Today over on CAG in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issuesIts an assured non-shorthold tenacy, moved in 2004.Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....0
-
Does anyone know what a RAP 5 form what ever it is ?
and have a link to it ...
Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....0 -
In the meantime, I negotiated with my landlord and reached an amicable solution.I’ve just spent three months battling with them.
Perhaps the HA feel that a tribunal is the appropriate manner to resolve all the issues. Hence their reluctance now to speak to you.0 -
HellenMellon wrote: »No its resolved. The LL sent a letter confiming the removal of the service charge and my rent is back at the new level set for April 2013.
So when did this letter arrive !Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....0 -
HellenMellon wrote: »First week in May. There was three in all that were sent a few days apart. Each dealt with specific admin aspects.
Oh well, time will tell. At least I'm a bit forewarned of possible events and outcomes, and that after all is all you can seek in the way of advice when the shop is closed (so to speak).
I have to thank all of you for replying, Im sure there are better things to do on a Sunday, but I do appreciate the advice and help.
Many thanks
time will tell. :jAdvice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....0 -
propertyman wrote: »Why have you not WRITTEN TO the RAC and said
"Hi I told you not too proceed and you said ok-all in writing. KINDLY CANCEL THE hearing."0 -
Does anyone know what a RAP 5 form what ever it is ?
and have a link to it ...
There are various RPT (residential Property Tribunal) forms here,
and there's LVT5 here (Lease Variation).
Also
Application for a determination of liability to pay service charges
(LVT4)
RAP? :question:0 -
Thanks G_M
I already knew about the link you showed.
Just wanted to see what the OP would post and had actually filled in,if anything ?HellenMellon wrote: »Thats the reason this started with the RAC. They requested I submit the RAP 5 so they could see if it could be dealt with under the LVT or RAC. As it was not a 99 year lease (bearing in mind I was disputing a service charge and not the rent) they decided it would come under the RAC.
Shelter advised me not to go down the RAC route so I asked that any proceedings be halted whilst I engaged with my landlord.That should have said...persisted in trying to get my LL to talk to us !
So give us a link then on what you actually filled in then ?Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....0 -
Your rent is controlled under a statutory code set in 2002 where the increase is subject to CPI with a cap on that, so the RPTS has no jurisdiction.
Where they may have jurisdiction is over the amount of service charge if it is reserved as rent.
Rather than get into the complexities of that I suggest you follow my earlier advice and press them on why they are proceeding where the parties have agreed.Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold"; if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards