PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlord and Tenants Act vs Data Protection Act

2»

Comments

  • spooky69
    spooky69 Posts: 89 Forumite
    I thought so - thanks for the confirmation.
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 9 May 2013 at 4:02PM
    spooky69 wrote: »

    Thoughts?

    1. Get that exact information from the letting agent in writing - email will do. Make sure they mention the DPA.

    2. Phone up the Information Commissioners Helpline and be prepared to put in a formal complaint.

    From the ICO website:
    ICO helpline on 0303 123 1113 or 01625 545745. It's open between 9am and 5pm, Monday to Friday.
    I'm sure your letting agent will enjoy receiving a letter from the ICO as now they are under the ICO's scrutiny.

    The ICO can and does investigate businesses with no warning.

    Edited to say: In this instance your landlord who is hiding behind the agent is operating as a business. Businesses can be a self-employed person, a limited company or a LLP and are exempt from the DPA in this regards.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    spooky69 wrote: »
    Indeed. The wording 'reasonable excuse' is in Section 1 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that you linked to.

    (2) A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with subsection (1) commits a summary offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.

    I presume a reasonable excuse would relate to not being able to disclose rather than choosing not to or being instructed not to.

    Well you have misread it hence my earlier reply :)

    The reasonable excuse is about failing to do so and avoiding prosecution, but that does not alter remove or change the absolute requirement to provide it.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    G_M wrote: »
    The difficulty is enforcement. Agents often ignore the Act and do as here - ignore the request or refuse to comply. They do this either through ignorance, or .... because they can!


    Enforcement is via
    1:the local authority, normally the tenancy relations officer or similar, or a
    2: private prosecution in the magistrates court, via the online civil procedure rules and wander into the magistrates court and ask for the form.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • braun_2
    braun_2 Posts: 133 Forumite
    Can't you get the LLs name/address from the land registry for £3?

    I find it hard to believe the LL can remain anonymous as he is renting out a house/has certain legal responsibilities/maintenance etc. etc.

    I mean even if you deal with someone solicitor, you still know who that solicitor is representing.
  • propertyman
    propertyman Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    braun wrote: »
    Can't you get the LLs name/address from the land registry for £3?

    I find it hard to believe the LL can remain anonymous as he is renting out a house/has certain legal responsibilities/maintenance etc. etc.

    I mean even if you deal with someone solicitor, you still know who that solicitor is representing.

    See my earlier post.
    Stop! Think. Read the small print. Trust nothing and assume that it is your responsibility. That way it rarely goes wrong.
    Actively hunting down the person who invented the imaginary tenure, "share freehold";
    if you can show me one I will produce my daughter's unicorn
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    braun wrote: »
    Can't you get the LLs name/address from the land registry for £3?

    I find it hard to believe the LL can remain anonymous as he is renting out a house/has certain legal responsibilities/maintenance etc. etc.

    I mean even if you deal with someone solicitor, you still know who that solicitor is representing.
    The Land Reg may have the LL's actual address, or may not. There is no legal requirement for the LL to give his address to the LR. The address there may be the let property.

    A LL can comply with all his "legal responsibilities/maintenance etc." via his appointed agent.

    (of course, the agent must also comply with all his "legal responsibilities/maintenance etc", one of which is to provide the LL's address within 21 days of a written request by a tenant).
  • spooky69
    spooky69 Posts: 89 Forumite
    braun wrote: »
    Can't you get the LLs name/address from the land registry for £3?

    I find it hard to believe the LL can remain anonymous as he is renting out a house/has certain legal responsibilities/maintenance etc. etc.

    I mean even if you deal with someone solicitor, you still know who that solicitor is representing.

    As I said earlier, I already have the details (took me a few minutes and no cost). I expect that the landlord has no knowledge of the agents attempts to increase rent and create an annual chargeable event by trying to bully me into a new contract. The agent was taking the position that if I want to renew then I can enter into a new contract otherwise they will start showing people around - after 6 years on SPT (7 years in total with no problems) and within a month or two of them buying out the old agent. Quite a well-known agent as well, so I was a bit surprised at this.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.