We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Landlords to be responsible for vetting migrant tenants
Comments
-
-
MacMickster wrote: »If someone arrives in the UK on a tourist or student visa and fails to leave the country when they should, if they are still resident at the accommodation address that they gave when applying for their visa I would imagine that they are fairly easy for the Border Agency to remove.
I suspect that most anticipate this action, however, and move elsewhere so that they are not easily found. This proposal should make it harder for them to move elsewhere.
In my experience, the UKBA waits until it actually falls over people, rather than in any way actually looks for them.
A lot of the time they don't know if someone's left anyway....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I'm not sure how a landlord is supposed to decifer whether someone is an illegal immigrant or not. Therefore, although I am usually against landlords, I fail to see how they could be seen as liable.
As I've already said, my opinion is that the system would be too easy to work-around and thus I am dubious.
My contention is with this nonsense view that it is somehow impossible to do it at all. The system hasn't been defined yet, but it could be as simple as landlords needing to check identification. The standards required could be mandated and private firms would quickly pop-up that Landlords could send paperwork to and pay a small fee for them to validate, perform checks and insure them against fines.
The NHS one is more complicated, although frankly we're our own enemies on this issue as well. If someone turns up at their doctors/hospital in the severe stages of kidney failure (for example) having never been to the doctors before about it then there is a higher than normal chance this might be health tourism. A remotely decent expert system (or fraud department) could look for the tell-tale signs like this and investigate as required.Having a signature removed for mentioning the removal of a previous signature. Blackwhite bellyfeel double plus good...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards