PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying a repo

We've found a great house that requires a fair bit of tidying up - cosmetic mainly. It's a repossessed property that we think has been on the market since before Christmas.

It was bought back in 2006 for £206k as a new build. My guess is that it was never worth that and explains why the current asking price is £155k.

We're thinking of going in with a cheeky offer of £130k (knowing full well it'll be rejected, but got to start somewhere). Houses nearby have sold for £149k but they're in a good state. Our maximum would have to be £143k. As we're ready to move and have an AIP, I wonder how much weight sellers will place on this ability to move quickly?

We also noticed that the house next door (previously owned by same people) has just been repossessed. Assuming the same lender, any likelihood that they'll be keen to get rid of the one we're looking at ASAP?

I've read a fair few horror stories about buying repossessed properties - such as the seller using delaying tactics and having a last minute offer come in much higher. Appreciate that this is a risk and potentially could cost money in terms of surveys, legal fees etc.

Comments

  • ValHaller
    ValHaller Posts: 5,212 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    In your position, I would not negotiate above 140 and save the 3 to cover a late gazump. As I understand these things - from a background of zero - the gazump arises just before exchange, at which point you have laid out all your fees and are most vulnerable to a demand for more. If you don't get it for 140, well no wasted fees
    You might as well ask the Wizard of Oz to give you a big number as pay a Credit Referencing Agency for a so-called 'credit-score'
  • I_have_spoken
    I_have_spoken Posts: 5,051 Forumite
    Who is seller? Mortgage provider unwinding a BTL empire? I'd suggest realistic price is set by the rental income that would give a 7% yield, less the cost of making good.
  • The property was clearly bought by the current owners on a BTL basis. Mortgage provider was (the apparently now defunct and nationalised) Mortgage Express.

    Any ideas how the NHBC warranty will be affected by the sale? I know caveat emptor takes on a whole new meaning when it comes to repos.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    This thread is 5 months old!

    And touting for business is not permitted.

    Reported.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.