PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Avoid triggering repayment of discount on right to buy house

Options
2»

Comments

  • notanewuser
    notanewuser Posts: 8,499 Forumite
    LittleMax wrote: »
    Indeed ... how much can a family grow in a year? There can have only been one additional child and they would still be in mum and dad's room.

    There is such a thing as a multiple pregnancy, but it doesn't sound like that's what has happened here. The OP clearly just wants to make a fast buck.
    Trying to be a man is a waste of a woman
  • gettingbetter
    gettingbetter Posts: 1,449 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    this has to be a wind up

    kas x
    br no 188 ;) AD 17th apr 09:D
    :Dmortgage free 22/5/09:D
    :Ddebt free 11/8/09:D
    :j#18 £2 saver = £ :T sealed pot #333
    silent member of mikes mob
    i will lose weight :rolleyes: i will sort my house :o
  • foolishboy
    foolishboy Posts: 321 Forumite
    And suddenly able to afford a bigger house and move up the ladder 5 mins after qualifying for a right to buy discount .. that scheme is so wrong :-(
  • duchy
    duchy Posts: 19,511 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Xmas Saver!
    edited 2 May 2013 at 6:34AM
    It isn't the scheme that is wrong-it's the chancers who try to abuse it !

    Circumstances can change so choices are either rearrange living space for four years or bite the bullet and lose the discount. Only other option I can see is rent out property and rent something bigger but may not fly with the mortgage company.

    Really though the OP made me laugh -they sounded so surprised that they had run out of bedrooms :)
    I Would Rather Climb A Mountain Than Crawl Into A Hole

    MSE Florida wedding .....no problem
  • foolishboy
    foolishboy Posts: 321 Forumite
    duchy wrote: »
    It isn't the scheme that is wrong-it's the chancers who try to abuse it !

    Actually I'd love to hear some decent reasons why the scheme is a good thing.

    - It reduces stock of LA housing that someone might actually need
    - When is cash gift, because that's what it is after 5 years, OK for one person and not OK for others who have worked hard and contributed far more (financially) to the benefit pot?

    ..owning your own house is not a right surely?

    What am I missing here? I'm happy to be wrong! :-)

    FB
  • seven-day-weekend
    seven-day-weekend Posts: 36,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Cheap sofa bed/blow up mattress for you and the wife in the living room, split the kids between the 2 rooms. Wait 5 years, then sell.

    This is the best option. I know a family in exactly the same position as yourselves, that's exactly what they did until the kids grew up. You need only do it for four years.
    (AKA HRH_MUngo)
    Member #10 of £2 savers club
    Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton
  • Georgiegirl256
    Georgiegirl256 Posts: 7,005 Forumite
    I take it that your youngest child is the boy? Am I correct? It's just what Im getting from the above information, I could obviously be totally wrong (it has been known :rotfl:), but regardless, him or her is still just a baby, why not have them in with you and your wife, bingo, problem sorted, the girls can then have their room back, you can hold on for another few years and then move!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.