We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Interest rates at 7%
Comments
-
seven-day-weekend wrote: »Right, yes....age and equity.... thanks all.
Although....if the house prices are too high for FTBs anyway, well does it matter if BTLs buy them? I don't see how this is putting the prices up, unless the BTLs pay over the odds?
If a FTB can't aford a mortgage on a house for £150k, well they can't afford it, so how is the BTL stopping them having the place?
Sorry to be so dim, economics is not my strong point!
Because demand for properties = speculative (e.g. BTL) demand + actual demand for places to live. So if the BTL demand disappeared, house prices would have to adjust to the new supply/demand balance, and potentially fall so that the FTBs can afford them. So, with eager BTL investors competing against each other, the price might go up to £150K. But if sentiment turns and BTL comes to be seen as a losing investment, sellers of houses will have to price them lower so that the remaining buyers, mainly FTBs, can buy them. Or they won't sell.0 -
:-) I like your sense of humour!
I wasn't being humorous. Or at least not intending to be. I think a dirty bomb attack on London would cause effects due to sentiment, people not wanting to live there, that would be way greater than any physical damage (including radiation) due to the bomb itself.0 -
Because demand for properties = speculative (e.g. BTL) demand + actual demand for places to live. So if the BTL demand disappeared, house prices would have to adjust to the new supply/demand balance, and potentially fall so that the FTBs can afford them. So, with eager BTL investors competing against each other, the price might go up to £150K. But if sentiment turns and BTL comes to be seen as a losing investment, sellers of houses will have to price them lower so that the remaining buyers, mainly FTBs, can buy them. Or they won't sell.
Light has dawned! Simple really, isn't it?:rotfl: :rotfl: :beer:(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
seven-day-weekend wrote: »Perhaps it's me, but I don't see why people say BTL puts FTBs out of the market?
Surely the FTBs could buy the houses when they become available just as easily as the BTLs? The BTLs don't get them 20 grand cheaper or anything, do they?
Or have I missed something blindlingly obvious?
Not really. Many of the BTL's are being bought by boomers with plenty of money to spare. I know because I'm one and that's what I did 11 years ago!0 -
seven-day-weekend wrote: »Right, yes....age and equity.... thanks all.
Although....if the house prices are too high for FTBs anyway, well does it matter if BTLs buy them? I don't see how this is putting the prices up, unless the BTLs pay over the odds?
If a FTB can't aford a mortgage on a house for £150k, well they can't afford it, so how is the BTL stopping them having the place?
Sorry to be so dim, economics is not my strong point!
The argument (that I don't entirely subscribe to) is that BTLers are bidding up prices for properties (that bit is undeniable) and that something must be done to stop it (that bit I don't agree with).
There is a massive speculative bubble in UK housing that has built up. BTL has pumped in quite a lot of this air. The way it and most other bubbles work is similar:
1. Asset prices start rising.
2. People borrow against those paper profits to buy more of that asset
3. As people are now demanding more of that asset at any given price, the price will rise
4. People can borrow still more against their rising asset and buy yet more of the asset. As people see the easy profits available, more pile in to the market.
What happens next:
5. One day, sentiment changes. It needn't be a big change or any event that causes it. Prices start to fall.
6. As prices start to fall, the process of borrowing more to buy is no longer available. Falls in price start to accelerate.
7. Now it gets nasty. People who have overstretched themselves are desperate to get out. Forced selling starts. At this point, if you're very unlucky, you discover that if prices are falling quickly enough there is no market price. That is there are no buyers at almost any price.
Parts 1-4 are already happening. It remains to be seen whether 5-7 will occur. I think they will, others don't.0 -
I've got some tulip bulbs to shift - anyone interested?0
-
mystic_trev wrote: »I've got some tulip bulbs to shift - anyone interested?
It's all the same thing. Tulip bulbs, dot com shares. It doesn't seem to matter: greed (aka human nature)+borrowed money = bubble.
Anyone know what happened to that bloke that remortgaged his house to day trade dot com shares for the Sunday Times?0 -
When rates were down at 4% or even 3.5% why the hell did people not fix their mortgage to the rest of the term?
What was everyone waiting for?
Likewise even at 5.5% now, those that take out new mortgages, why arent they fixing for the term or at least 10 yrs given the climate.
The 7% level wouldnt matter then?????????????????
Dumb a55 brits.0 -
ukbondraider wrote: »Likewise even at 5.5% now, those that take out new mortgages, why arent they fixing for the term or at least 10 yrs given the climate.
Probably due to the penalties levied by most of the banks on longer term fixes. Predicting a persons life/circumstances over 3-5 years is hard enough, 10-25 years even harder0 -
Immature.
You're either a dreamer (with minimal self-respect and expect everyone else to bail you out) or you're just a kid messing about on the board.
that is very much uncalled for! :mad:
Who are you to dictate who can have whast opininon
I agree, its better to live your life than constantly sitting around navel gazing over interest rates.
I have been party to these discussions for over a year, work in the industry nd will contribute to more debates time after time. Whether that changes the economy- I dunno
maybe im just immature :rolleyes::beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

