PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tenant decided to stay

A friends tenants gave the one months notice to leave (all done correctly)
Due to leave 21st of this month.

Agent finds new tenant, due to move in 28th of this month.

Present tenant rang LL saying they would like to stay for two more months (due to a delay with there next rental)

They have not been the best of tenants plus the new tenant is desperate to move in on the 28th

We all here about tenants no moving out (mainly after the LL gave 2 months notice) but what (if anything) can be done in a case like this?
«1

Comments

  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,655 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When you say notice was received correctly, was this in writing?
    The LL does not need to accept the request for an extension and can go straight to court for posession if the T does not leave ( provided they can prove T gave notice).
  • david29dpo
    david29dpo Posts: 3,969 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Yes, in writing.
  • Old_Git
    Old_Git Posts: 4,751 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! Cashback Cashier
    sorry mate we have a replacement tenant ,do you need a hand to pack ..bye
    "Do not regret growing older, it's a privilege denied to many"
  • david29dpo
    david29dpo Posts: 3,969 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Very tempting but prefer to stay legal.
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,655 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    david29dpo wrote: »
    Very tempting but prefer to stay legal.

    I think OldGit makes a perfectly valid point; that the first thing to do is to tell the T firmly that they cannot stay and indeed that they have no legal right to stay.
  • thesaint
    thesaint Posts: 4,324 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    The landlord can apply for possession once the date of the original notice expires.

    The current tenant will be exposed to the costs that the landlord and incoming tenant face due to their actions.
    Well life is harsh, hug me don't reject me.
  • david29dpo
    david29dpo Posts: 3,969 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Interesting....
    If thats the case, why can't a LL do the same if he gave notice?
  • anselld
    anselld Posts: 8,655 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 April 2013 at 7:54AM
    david29dpo wrote: »
    Interesting....
    If thats the case, why can't a LL do the same if he gave notice?

    He can if it was correctly served. (ie go to court for posession). However, if the T gave notice then the tenancy has ended, however if the L gave notice the tenancy does not end until the court decides.

    The point being made is that the T cannot cancel their notice unilaterally, and I think eviction would be speedier and more certain in the case where T gave notice.
  • thesaint
    thesaint Posts: 4,324 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    david29dpo wrote: »
    Interesting....
    If thats the case, why can't a LL do the same if he gave notice?

    I don't quite understand your question, but, a landlord can not give notice(NTQ) on an AST tenant.
    Well life is harsh, hug me don't reject me.
  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    You could remind the tenant that they could be liable to pay double rent under the Distress of Rent Act if they hold over the tenancy.

    http://blog.painsmith.co.uk/2009/11/22/tenants-notices-to-quit-holding-over-and-double-rent/
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.