We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Mum passed intestate, need to change name on house

Hi there, thought I’d stop by for a bit of advice.

My beloved Mum passed intestate in January. Her only asset is the house, which is valued at circa £450k. She didn’t leave a written will, and she passed married to her husband of 5 and a half years.

I believe the house by default will go into his name, but Mum’s wish was for the house to go into the name of myself and my brother. I’m really not sure what to do next about this. Her husband has hired a solicitor who I haven’t had contact with in the past 3 months and I’m not sure what steps will now be taken. I just want to make sure her wishes were respected. I’ll say now that I don’t currently think there is no reason to believe this won’t happen, but I have to make sure I have the bases covered.

Mum passed these wishes on to many different people including her husband – my brother, my Aunt and uncle, her best friend, and myself – so I was mainly wondering that if we got into a situation where her husband did try to claim the house as his own, would we be able to contest it? And would this be reasonable grounds to contest and get any potential decision overturned?

I’m really not sure what to do next to be honest, just want to make sure as I said that I’m ready for anything that could happen.

Thanks in advance
«1345

Comments

  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Her "wishes" Died with her.
    No will = Husband is sole beneficiary of everything. End of story.
    There is no such thing as someone's wishes unless they put those wishes in to a legal document called a will.
    Be happy...;)
  • skizz_b
    skizz_b Posts: 196 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks for that very "helpful" advice there. I am more than aware of what a will is.

    Tell me then, if wishes "died" with the person who made a will, why are they often contested?

    Ever so considerate in your words.
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,607 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sorry for your loss

    The law in intestacy is here http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cto/customerguide/page14-1.htm

    You will need to abide by those rules. The fact that mum did not make a will after her marriage means that her wishes are irrelevant.
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,607 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    spacey2012 wrote: »
    No will = Husband is sole beneficiary of everything. End of story.

    Incorrect http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cto/customerguide/page14-1.htm
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • skizz_b
    skizz_b Posts: 196 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    RAS wrote: »
    Sorry for your loss

    The law in intestacy is here http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cto/customerguide/page14-1.htm

    You will need to abide by those rules. The fact that mum did not make a will after her marriage means that her wishes are irrelevant.

    Thanks for this, much appreciated.

    Perhaps if I can find where she's put it in writing somewhere this may be admissible?

    In essence there are no grounds for contention on repeated verbal assertions?
  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    They are not, a will can be contested, wishes can not.
    If she died with no will, her husband now owns everything that they owned jointly or independently, the house belongs to the husband unless you can pull a Legal will out of a hat.
    You can contest nothing as you have no legal or lawful grounds to do so unless the marriage was unlawful .
    All you can do is hope that the husband as you call him looks upon you favourably when his time comes.
    This is not what you want to hear, but it is very "helpful" as it is the truth.
    Be happy...;)
  • RAS
    RAS Posts: 36,607 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    skizz_b wrote: »

    In essence there are no grounds for contention on repeated verbal assertions?

    None whatsoever.
    If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing
  • skizz_b
    skizz_b Posts: 196 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    RAS wrote: »
    None whatsoever.

    Ok. So what happens from here? The solicitor sorts the estate and then divides it as per the intestate laws?
  • skizz_b
    skizz_b Posts: 196 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    spacey2012 wrote: »
    This is not what you want to hear, but it is very "helpful" as it is the truth.

    your advice was helpful, your tonality was not.
  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    You have to abide by the intestacy rules others have posted. Her husband will be first in line to obtain letters of administration. You can only obtain them if he declines.

    If all affected beneficiaries agree, you can execute a deed of variation to change the default distribution.
    RAS's_link wrote:
    You have selected the following
    • The estate is in England & Wales
    • There is a surviving spouse or civil partner
    • There are children or remoter issue of the deceased
    If this is not correct return to page 14 of the Customer Guide
    If this is correct, the estate passes as follows
    • The surviving spouse or civil partner receives the chattels, a statutory legacy of £250,000 (£125,000 if the death was before 1 February 2009) and a life interest in half of the residue.
    • The children receive the other half of the residue in equal shares. If any of the deceased’s children have died leaving issue, then the issue will receive their parents' share per stirpes.
    Note - If the estate is less than £250,000 (£125,000 if the death was before 1 February 2009), the deceased's surviving spouse or civil partner will receive the whole of the estate.
    spacey2012 wrote: »
    If she died with no will, her husband now owns everything that they owned jointly or independently
    Wrong, as above.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.