We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
which is the better option?
buzi
Posts: 139 Forumite
which is the better option, the 2.5% 1 year santander cash isa or the 3% 2 year santander cash isa? thanks
0
Comments
-
Depends if you are happy to lock your money for 2 years? If yes, 3% otherwise 2.5%0
-
Also depends if you're a 123 account holder or not, if not it's 2.8% not 3%0
-
Why not buy say Old Mutual UK Select Mid Cap as an ISA
Up 30% last year and 80% over the last 5 years even with the big down a few years ago.
How does 3% pa look against that and you can move your Old Mutual to different funds as it is not locked in like your cash ISAs.It's your money. Except if it's the governments.0 -
Impossible to sayis there any chance that the rates might be better next year, or maybe im asking for the impossible considering current financial situ!
Look at it this way, if you went for the 2.5% you'd need at least 3.5% next year to match the 2 year average of the 3% deal
Also bear in mind the 2.5% is variable so could technically go down, again doubtful but ...
For my part I'm going for the 3%0 -
i wish i could but havent a clue what old mutual uk isWhy not buy say Old Mutual UK Select Mid Cap as an ISA
Up 30% last year and 80% over the last 5 years even with the big down a few years ago.
How does 3% pa look against that and you can move your Old Mutual to different funds as it is not locked in like your cash ISAs.
0 -
i suppose another way of looking at it is if i do need to move the money out before end of two year fix then i would probably get about 2.5% after penaltiesImpossible to say
Look at it this way, if you went for the 2.5% you'd need at least 3.5% next year to match the 2 year average of the 3% deal
Also bear in mind the 2.5% is variable so could technically go down, again doubtful but ...
For my part I'm going for the 3%0 -
-
is there any chance that the rates might be better next year, or maybe im asking for the impossible considering current financial situ!

Good question.
Judging by the small print in Osborne's speech, the war on savers will continue, and interest rates won't rise. But he is assuming the economy will grow so that the Government won't have to borrow more money and pay more to do so. They can force us to accept their freshly printed pounds by the barrowload, but will need hard currency to pay for imports. I don't know what will happen then?“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.6K Spending & Discounts
- 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards