We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

which is the better option?

which is the better option, the 2.5% 1 year santander cash isa or the 3% 2 year santander cash isa? thanks :)
«1

Comments

  • ramjug
    ramjug Posts: 112 Forumite
    Depends if you are happy to lock your money for 2 years? If yes, 3% otherwise 2.5%
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 10,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    Also depends if you're a 123 account holder or not, if not it's 2.8% not 3%
  • buzi
    buzi Posts: 139 Forumite
    ramjug wrote: »
    Depends if you are happy to lock your money for 2 years? If yes, 3% otherwise 2.5%
    is there any chance that the rates might be better next year, or maybe im asking for the impossible considering current financial situ! :(
  • buzi
    buzi Posts: 139 Forumite
    ColdIron wrote: »
    Also depends if you're a 123 account holder or not, if not it's 2.8% not 3%
    i have 123
  • slinga
    slinga Posts: 1,485 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Why not buy say Old Mutual UK Select Mid Cap as an ISA

    Up 30% last year and 80% over the last 5 years even with the big down a few years ago.

    How does 3% pa look against that and you can move your Old Mutual to different funds as it is not locked in like your cash ISAs.
    It's your money. Except if it's the governments.
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 10,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    edited 25 March 2013 at 12:23PM
    buzi wrote: »
    is there any chance that the rates might be better next year, or maybe im asking for the impossible considering current financial situ! :(
    Impossible to say

    Look at it this way, if you went for the 2.5% you'd need at least 3.5% next year to match the 2 year average of the 3% deal

    Also bear in mind the 2.5% is variable so could technically go down, again doubtful but ...

    For my part I'm going for the 3%
  • buzi
    buzi Posts: 139 Forumite
    slinga wrote: »
    Why not buy say Old Mutual UK Select Mid Cap as an ISA

    Up 30% last year and 80% over the last 5 years even with the big down a few years ago.

    How does 3% pa look against that and you can move your Old Mutual to different funds as it is not locked in like your cash ISAs.
    i wish i could but havent a clue what old mutual uk is :o
  • buzi
    buzi Posts: 139 Forumite
    ColdIron wrote: »
    Impossible to say

    Look at it this way, if you went for the 2.5% you'd need at least 3.5% next year to match the 2 year average of the 3% deal

    Also bear in mind the 2.5% is variable so could technically go down, again doubtful but ...

    For my part I'm going for the 3%
    i suppose another way of looking at it is if i do need to move the money out before end of two year fix then i would probably get about 2.5% after penalties
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    slinga wrote: »
    Up 30% last year and 80% over the last 5 years
    investing by past performance is like driving by looking in your rear view mirror ;)
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    buzi wrote: »
    is there any chance that the rates might be better next year, or maybe im asking for the impossible considering current financial situ! :(

    Good question.
    Judging by the small print in Osborne's speech, the war on savers will continue, and interest rates won't rise. But he is assuming the economy will grow so that the Government won't have to borrow more money and pay more to do so. They can force us to accept their freshly printed pounds by the barrowload, but will need hard currency to pay for imports. I don't know what will happen then?
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.