We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Clear majority of people support Help To Buy
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Absolute Nonsense.
The percentage of after tax income being used to service mortgage payments is currently 28%, at near record lows, versus the long term average of 37% and peak of 68% in 1990.
What income is that being assessed against? Average? Your favoured 70%?
The peaks were against stupid mortgage provision. Perhaps somewhere closer to 28% is sensible and the new "normal".
Don't the Americans work on 28% of Gross being the sensible affordability level to include all housing cost including things like Council Tax? Don't they also apply a 36% against price upper threshold to include all recurring debt commitments car loans, credit card commitments, child care etc?"If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
-
Bah, rubbish.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
I refer to the help to buy that only applies to new builds.
Overpriced means a differential between 'new build' and already existing.
I accept the arguments about buying earlier so saving on rent but the problem arises when one wants to sell.
Depending upon the 'new build' premium, the eventual the sale may be in negative equity.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »You'll have to take a "special" mortgage to get this.
Obviously, it's not 20k in cash.
I wouldn't be so sure with this incompetent bunch in charge Graham.0 -
I refer to the help to buy that only applies to new builds.
Overpriced means a differential between 'new build' and already existing.
I accept the arguments about buying earlier so saving on rent but the problem arises when one wants to sell.
Depending upon the 'new build' premium, the eventual the sale may be in negative equity.
Err, would the same apply to cars?0 -
A scheme to help the money lending rather than those paying it.
If prices crash, they get less as people borrow less, so they need to keep the market manipulated and keep prices sky high.
More they cost, more they lend, more they get.
Last thing they care about is the people.Be happy...;)0 -
spacey2012 wrote: »A scheme to help the money lending rather than those paying it.
If prices crash, they get less as people borrow less, so they need to keep the market manipulated and keep prices sky high.
More they cost, more they lend, more they get.
Last thing they care about is the people.0 -
Err, would the same apply to cars?
The issue is that if the only way people can buy a property is to buy an new house, they will be tempted to do so without looking at the longer term consequences.
So if subsequently they need to move they will
a. have to repay the 20% government loan and
b. may well suffer a loss on the price
so it's quite possible that they will be unable to repay the government debt without getting a loan.
It's a high risk purchase which may well suit a few people but it isn't something the government should be advocating.0 -
grizzly1911 wrote: »The peaks were against stupid mortgage provision.
The peak was in 1990.
You think that was "stupid mortgage provision"?“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards