We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Final salary pension decision
mookev
Posts: 65 Forumite
I am about to receive a final salary pension from a previous employer. I have a choice of £12000 CPI linked income and a lump sum of £36000 or a £10000 CPI linked income and a lump sum of £66000. I intend to keep in full time work for a short period but may look to go part time shortly to enhance my free time. I have been advised by a financial advisor it is better to take the 2nd option and invest the lump sum if an investment bond and take 5% income per year but my caution says take the larger income.. Which do you think is the better option.
0
Comments
-
How long do you intend to live?This is an open forum, anyone can post and I just did !0
-
Until I die!0
-
Do you have a specific plan /need for the larger lump sum (gift to child as house deposit, extension to home, trip round the world etc)?
If not, it comes down to life expectancy and a view on inflation - if you think you have a reasonable chance of still being in the land of the living for the next say 20 years or more, it makes sense to take smaller lump sum and larger pension?
You then have a choice of how to use the smaller lump sum - using your isa allowance each year will keep any income tax free.
When will you draw your state pension?
Do you have a pension in your current employment?0 -
Part of your calculation should also be how annual increases will affect the pension, initially the gap is 2k between the higher and lower lump sums, but how big will that gap be in 20 years time?
I'd take the larger lump sum but I don't expect to live too long, take a look at your life expectancy, family trends etc and get some rough figures for both options.0 -
The difference between the two options is taking £30k in hand now or waiting 15 years for Option 1 to break even with Option 2. And yes after 15 years Option 1 is paying you £2k extra annually.
You can take the £30k and invest it well to, based on investment choices, make a decent profit in 15 years time so its down to you really. Personally, I'd take the extra £30k and go for Option 2 because of 2 things
1. I prefer having control of my money and managing my investment and 15 years is a long time to double/triple that £30k rather than being drip fed £2k a year
2. No matter how fit I am today no one can guarantee I will be alive 15 years down the road or for that matter what the word 'cash' will mean in 2028
All the best
DV0 -
If they are both index linked, the gap will be exactly the same as it is now in terms of spending power.Part of your calculation should also be how annual increases will affect the pension, initially the gap is 2k between the higher and lower lump sums, but how big will that gap be in 20 years time?0 -
Life expectancy?
Inflation expectations over the next 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more years?
Possible investment returns and attitude to risk?
Need for immediate lump sum?
Other sources of retirement income?
Probably no single right or wrong answer - everyone's circumstances and views on the above will be different, but these and some of the other questions posed by other posters might be relevant0 -
opinions4u wrote: »If they are both index linked, the gap will be exactly the same as it is now in terms of spending power.
I understand what you are saying but disagree. The actual cash amount difference will increase whilst the spending power assumption requires that everything increases in price equally, that does't tend to happen. No matter, I'd still take the lump sum myself as you never know what is around the corner.0 -
Here's the difference between Venus and Mars.
Take the 12K pension and smaller lump sum. Men like to get their hands on the dosh, assuming they won't live 15 years ;-)
I know what is around the corner, increased LE.0 -
Taking the smaller lump sum and bigger pension is equivalent to investing £30k into an index-linked annuity paying 6.7% p.a. initially. That's far better value than any commercial annuity. So if you reckon you have a decent life expectancy and you have no urgent need for the lump sum, take the bigger pension. If you later need a bit more lump sum, borrow it. Interest rates are low and you'll have an extra £2k p.a. index-linked with which to pay off the loan.Free the dunston one next time too.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards