We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Are we entitled to a refund?
Comments
-
As far as we are concerned it wasn't damaged - either the item or the packaging (when sent anyway). So we want to find out from the online place exactly what they mean.Thank you to everyone who posts comps! :A
I would like to be lucky,healthy & happy in 2020! :T0 -
Definitely worth finding out, as where goods are returned at your expense DSRs also place a duty on you to ensure they arrive in the same condition received, effectively.if he sends the goods in accordance with paragraph (5)(b), he shall be under a duty to take reasonable care to see that they are received by the supplier and not damaged in transit,0
-
I'm reading the op to mean both was damaged, the other customers and the one received by op.
Yep I read it that they had received those goods back damaged and because it was damaged....assumed it was the other persons.
Will be a bonus if OP's wasnt damaged though. Makes things much easier. If OP's is damaged....then a claim against DHL by whoever contracted/paid them for their services might be in order.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
How did you pay? If by card, you might want to ask your bank to undertake a chargeback.
In this instance a chargeback is not avaiable.
Goods not faulty.
Only OP ordered wrong item. (not covered)
Only option would be non reciept of refund. Now that requires a refund reciept.
So something that says
Dog hut has refunded £xx on xx-xx-xxxx to card end 1234.
Given the answers the OP has provided. The chance of that is about the same as a heatwave overnight.Never ASSUME anything its makes a>>> A55 of U & ME <<<0 -
dalesrider wrote: »In this instance a chargeback is not avaiable.
Goods not faulty.
Only OP ordered wrong item. (not covered)
Only option would be non reciept of refund. Now that requires a refund reciept.
So something that says
Dog hut has refunded £xx on xx-xx-xxxx to card end 1234.
Given the answers the OP has provided. The chance of that is about the same as a heatwave overnight.
If op hasn't received a refund, how would it even be possible to provide a receipt of said refund
Although it's very rare for consumers to receive a credit note when being given a refund, it's usually just logged by the company and processed internally.
The reasons for chargebacks though vary based on what card is being used. Reason codes are listed here: http://www.managechargebacks.com/reasoncodes.html.
Although I would agree that a chargeback code may not apply to op. It wouldn't be unknown for a bank to play loosely with the reasons for the chargeback - it just increases the likelihood of it being rejected by the retailers merchant account provider;0 -
If op hasn't received a refund, how would it even be possible to provide a receipt of said refund
Exactly... This is why the non reciept of refund c/b is very much a joke. As a retailer can easily avoid providing the required evidence.Although I would agree that a chargeback code may not apply to op. It wouldn't be unknown for a bank to play loosely with the reasons for the chargeback - it just increases the likelihood of it being rejected by the retailers merchant account provider;
Only one that could apply would be a 53. But would require OP to stretch the truth and say that ordered a diffrent size (would need to prove this).
So best option would be to say (retailer thought this) that the goods were faulty.
Personally I would try that, but as you say there is a good chance that it would reject.
Still this would lead to a chance on a Pre-Abritation on the basis that the retailer has not refunded when they have not recieved the goods back. Not so easy for them to reject.
Not going to be a quick process. As yo uhave 45 days for rejection and then 21 days to action the pre-arb side.
So OP. Give it a go via a chargeback. Just be aware it may not work. But as Ilke to say. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.Never ASSUME anything its makes a>>> A55 of U & ME <<<0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards