We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking on zigzag lines
Options

Josephine13
Posts: 3 Newbie
I have received a penalty charge for allegedly dropping someone off on a zigzag line. However, my front tyres stopped short of the start of the zigzag. Is there any case law which says which part of a vehicle needs to be over the zigzag? I thought it was measured from the tyres - it's certainly what I check when I am parking in a normal parking space.
0
Comments
-
Is this white zig-zags on a pedestrian crossing, rather than yellow ones outside schools? And is it a council-issued PCN?
Best go here: http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showforum=30 and post the details. They'll need to see the actual notice (with your personal detailed removed).
From what you say, if you were only inches over the zig-zags, there may be a de minimis defence.0 -
Josephine13 wrote: »I have received a penalty charge for allegedly dropping someone off on a zigzag line. However, my front tyres stopped short of the start of the zigzag. Is there any case law which says which part of a vehicle needs to be over the zigzag? I thought it was measured from the tyres - it's certainly what I check when I am parking in a normal parking space.
The front of your car starts at the front of your car, not at the front tyres!"You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0 -
maninthestreet wrote: »The front of your car starts at the front of your car, not at the front tyres!
Wow that's really helpful, very inspiring!
Anyway OP please follow the advice of posting on pepipoo as they offer advice without the moral judgemental minority who resides on here sometimesWhen posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
We don't need the following to help you.
Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
:beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:0 -
maninthestreet wrote: »The front of your car starts at the front of your car, not at the front tyres!
No it doesn't. As a former CEO I'm telling that overhang does qualify as being ticketable. You need to get your facts right - next thing we know you'll be telling us that double yellow lines won't get you a ticket unless your wheels are actually on the lines (and no that isn't the case - they simply indicate that no waiting applies to the boundary of the street which includes the pavement).
EDIT:
Thats supposed to read "does NOT qualify as being ticketable".
Sorry for any confusion, been a rough day.0 -
As it is only a matter of inches it would be worthwhile looking at the actual traffic order & getting out a tape measure to ensure that the zigzag lines are in the correct place.0
-
TrickyWicky wrote: »No it doesn't. As a former CEO I'm telling that overhang does qualify as being ticketable.
Which unless I am missing something that appears to be what maninthestreet is saying, so why accuse them of getting their facts wrong.0 -
TrickyWicky wrote: »No it doesn't. As a former CEO I'm telling that overhang does qualify as being ticketable. You need to get your facts right - next thing we know you'll be telling us that double yellow lines won't get you a ticket unless your wheels are actually on the lines (and no that isn't the case - they simply indicate that no waiting applies to the boundary of the street which includes the pavement).
I suggest you re-read what I wrote."You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0 -
TrickyWicky wrote: »No it doesn't. As a former CEO I'm telling that overhang does qualify as being ticketable. You need to get your facts right - next thing we know you'll be telling us that double yellow lines won't get you a ticket unless your wheels are actually on the lines (and no that isn't the case - they simply indicate that no waiting applies to the boundary of the street which includes the pavement).
Enlighten us then Mr former CEO, if your car starting at the front of your car isn't the same as your car starting at the overhang, what on earth is is?Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear0 -
The advice about the TRO is very good advice indeed, they have to be renewed periodically and rarely are.
If the CEO were a bit more helpful he might have told you that they dont actually enforce Yellow lines, they Enforce a Traffic regulation orders which convert Yellow lines in to enforceable areas.
Without a relevant Traffic regulation Order, the lines are Invalid, the Highway code may say otherwise, but it is just a code.
I would start by asking the Council to make available the order they enforcing.
Sooner or later they hit the wrong one.Be happy...;)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards