We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Secret Steal Of Our NI Contributions

123468

Comments

  • sharnad
    sharnad Posts: 9,904 Forumite
    zagfles wrote: »
    Indeed, but whatever the reasons for it, fact remains that on average public sector pay is higher and hours are lower than in the private. So someone in the public sector is a lot more likely to be able to afford a 1.4% increase in NI than someone in the private sector a 4.8% increase!

    Overall, the proposed changes as a result of the single tier state pension are (relatively) hugely beneficial for public sector workers compared to private. I think in 30 years time there's going to be quite a divide amongst pensioners, with public sector pensioners far better off than private sector pensioners. Now it's probably about even, since private sector pay used to be higher and private sector pensions used to often be as good as public sector pensions.

    Yes since public sector pay is lower than private sector paying more for a lower pension is great :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    Needing to lose weight start date 26 December 2011 current loss 60 pound Down. Lots more to go to get into my size 6 jeans
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    sharnad wrote: »
    Yes since public sector pay is lower than private sector paying more for a lower pension is great :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
    Public sector pay is higher. Public sector pensions are higher. What are you :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:about?
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    zagfles wrote: »
    Public sector pay is higher. Public sector pensions are higher. What are you :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:about?


    Can you provide the proof for your claim that they are paid more for equivalent jobs and roles or that the private sector works longer hours?
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Can you provide the proof for your claim that they are paid more for equivalent jobs and roles
    Where have I claimed they are paid more "for equivalent jobs"? I simply claimed they are paid more on average.
    or that the private sector works longer hours?
    See http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/mar/27/public-private-sector-pay
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    zagfles wrote: »
    It doesn't matter, in the context of what we're discussing in this thread. This isn't a discussion about whether the public sector deserves to be paid more or not, it's a discussion about the state pension changes and the affordability of a 1.4% NI hike, compared to 4.8% in the private sector.

    In the same way as you could argue that a 1.4% pay cut to a JP Morgan employee was more affordable than a 4.8% pay cut to a McDonalds employee. Whether the JP Morgan employee deserves higher pay is completely irrelavent to the affordability of the pay cut.

    I agree its irrelevant to the thread topic but it was you who mentioned the spurious fact of relative averages!
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    BobQ wrote: »
    I agree its irrelevant to the thread topic but it was you who mentioned the spurious fact of relative averages!
    Yes. Because that's relevant to the affordability of the NI increase.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    zagfles wrote: »

    More selective statistics! The number of hours worked is irrelevant it simply reflects the different proportion of part time workers in the two sectors.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    zagfles wrote: »
    Yes. Because that's relevant to the affordability of the NI increase.

    Why is the relative average got anything to do with affordability of the increase in NI?

    The point you are making is that more NI will need to be paid to protect pensions in the private sector.

    1.4% is always going to be more affordable than 4.8% regardless of pay.

    Average pay in the private sector will be lower because the mix of jobs is totally different.

    The article you posted makes that quite clear.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • Really beginning to wonder if ANY of these policies is ever going to happen... the way the polls are going Cons wont even be here after 2015 anyway so Goves plans, workfare SureStart all just hovering... like banks, we re now into that pre election anticipatory phase of 'waiting to see what happens' - same with Spare Home Subsidy - dont think any providrs private or otherwise will make any concrete plans!!
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    zagfles wrote: »
    So someone in the public sector is a lot more likely to be able to afford a 1.4% increase in NI than someone in the private sector a 4.8% increase!

    Most of the public sector are facing increasing pension contributions. April 2013 sees year 2 of 3 years of rises. At a time when basic pay is frozen ((now until March 2016). So there is a slow squeeze on public sector pay.

    There's more happening as well. Hence why the PCS union held a strike on Budget Day.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.