We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What percentage of your income was on monthly mortgage (FTBs)?
Comments
-
Lol, I assure you I'm on MUCH nearer £1.5k a month than £6k. Not far off £1.5k a month at all, in fact.
What makes the difference is that my other fixed outgoings are very low. I haven't got any kids (the big one!), haven't got a car, have minimal commuting costs and eat very cheaply (vegetarian and from Lidl/Indian supermarket).
Affordability is what's key, not income alone.
Obviously lifestyle is an issue. I have no choice but to commute 60 miles a day for work and pay £150 a month on fuel.
I'm also something of a gourmet and like to eat out frequently. Each to his own!0 -
Household income or individual income?
Probably true for household income since women were less likely to work back then. To put it another way, the average house cost maybe 3.5 times one person's earnings in the 70s and now it costs roughly 3.5 times 2 people's earnings!
As I stated in my post in 1976 you could easaily afford an average 3 bed semi on 3X average full time salary. Now even with two full time average salaries you would struggle in the south of England. It's true that far fewer married women worked back then, but it's a stark contrast even so.0 -
As I stated in my post in 1976 you could easaily afford an average 3 bed semi on 3X average full time salary. Now even with two full time average salaries you would struggle in the south of England. It's true that far fewer married women worked back then, but it's a stark contrast even so.
I don't disagree with you, Tancred. House prices haven't increased evenly across the country.As a recent London FTB with no one to share my mortgage with, I know that as well as anyone!Saving for deposit: Finished! :j
House buying: Finished!
Next task: Lots and lots of DIY0 -
Rubbish. The average salary is now £26k - what can you get in the south-east for three times that (£78k) these days? Or even three times £30k - £90k? A studio flat maybe?
In 1976 the average wage was £3,744 a year and for three times that - £11,232 - you could buy a 3 bedroom semi in most parts of southern England. Maybe not with central heating and in perfect condition, but you could certainly find one.
I did say early http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/graphs-average-house-price-to-earnings-ratio.php0 -
Household income or individual income?
Probably true for household income since women were less likely to work back then. To put it another way, the average house cost maybe 3.5 times one person's earnings in the 70s and now it costs roughly 3.5 times 2 people's earnings!
As you can see from graph in previous post in the1970s house prices to earnings varied from just under 5x to just over 3x I believe the figure is now about 5x.
The figure used is male full time earnings.0 -
As I stated in my post in 1976 you could easaily afford an average 3 bed semi on 3X average full time salary. Now even with two full time average salaries you would struggle in the south of England. It's true that far fewer married women worked back then, but it's a stark contrast even so.
True 1976 was a pretty good time to buy as was 1996 but then 1972 and 1989 were pretty bad similar to now but not as bad as 2007.
Going back to original question percentage is a pretty meaningless measure for example its a lot harder to live on say 66% of £25k than 66% of £100k.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards