We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
So much for €100,000 protection - Cyprus bailout
Options
Comments
-
They could have done what Iceland did. (Forgetting that Landsbanki ended up being nearly solvent.) That is, move domestic owned deposits into a new 'good' bank and default on all foreign deposits.
I don't see this as a grab on Russian money. It's the opposite, it's a way to protect the Russian money and has best chance of being sold to the Bundestag as fair to the german taxpayer.
They can't do anything like Iceland did because they are a remote province of the EU (well, the ECB).
I just want to know if this will have any effect on the euro, but probably not much just yet.0 -
Dave and Gideon have spent more money in 3 years than Labour did in three terms
Whilst that is true, there are mitigating factors. The feuding between Blair and Brown caused both of them to buy support by being overgenerous to influential parts of the Civil Service. That built up during the time they were in power, so the bill only reached its current heights towards the end.
Its now a lot harder for Dave and Gideon to take it away than it was for Blair and Brown to give it - especially as their own position is not very strong.“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
Seems to only be a tax on savings accounts and therefore hitting ordinary people the hardest. Any sophisticated investor with substantial assets will be in property, funds, or shares which do not appear to be touched. Hence the wealthy seemed to have largely escaped unscathed.0
-
So it's all Fatcher's fault?
Good grief
Reaganomics is what allowed a lot of the rot to set in. She certainly played her part in wholesale banking deregulation and the unleashing of people best left chained to a wall in the basement.'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB0 -
So it's all Fatcher's fault?
Good grief
Who said its ALL Thatcher's Fault?
City Deregulation, Gerrymandering by selling Public Owned Housing and Infrastructure cheap, Closing down our Mining and Manufacturing, all took off under Thatcher. But successive Governments have made it worse.“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
Seems to only be a tax on savings accounts and therefore hitting ordinary people the hardest. Any sophisticated investor with substantial assets will be in property, funds, or shares which do not appear to be touched. Hence the wealthy seemed to have largely escaped unscathed.
Same as Britain then. Except Britain as taken twice as much (three times as much from those with less that E100k) surreptitiously as Cyprus plans to do openly.“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
Seems to only be a tax on savings accounts and therefore hitting ordinary people the hardest. Any sophisticated investor with substantial assets will be in property, funds, or shares which do not appear to be touched. Hence the wealthy seemed to have largely escaped unscathed.
Since when are property, funds and shares restricted to wealthy? There are no prerequisites for investing your money.Faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.0 -
Since when are property, funds and shares restricted to wealthy? There are no prerequisites for investing your money.
I suppose the point is that wealthier and, dare I say it, slightly better educated people, are in general, the only ones with surplus capital enough to invest their wealth elsewhere, in assets other than monopoly money and so shield themselves to some extent from the direct, negative effects of currency manipulation and theft by the crooks in charge.'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB0 -
Since when are property, funds and shares restricted to wealthy? There are no prerequisites for investing your money.
You need to be reasonably wealthy to invest in property, and to a lesser extent in shares and funds due to the dealing costs. Therefore, in general, less wealthy people simply save in savings accounts because they don't have enough money and probably neither the time or inclination to invest in anything else; pretty obvious right?0 -
Blair/Brown deserve all the bashing they can get, but don't forget that Gideon praised Ireland to the roof as the land to follow with low taxes and huge financial services industry just before the crash, and everything Labour did with the banks was too much red tape, the Tories wanting even more deregulation all round during those years.
The ONLY good thing that Brown ever did (apart from slagging off an old lady to lose the election) was keep us out of the Euro (in just to inflate Blairs' ego on the world stage), otherwise now we would be paying taxes to bale out Greece etc.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards