Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Cyprus surprise - Cypriot depositors to take a 'haircut'

Options
17810121383

Comments

  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Will banks now need to put a disclaimer on deposit accounts along the lines of "there is no guarantee you will receive you capital back on request"?
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    Leave cash in any one country, and there's a risk of a tax raid.



    Quite.

    In order for there to be zero risk, there needs to be zero return.

    When you expect more than zero returns, you have to accept more than zero risk.

    In case you hadn't noticed it is practically a zero return for most, especially after tax.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite

    From that statement.

    It's a decision that leads to the historic and permanent rescue our economy.

    Permanent or just the start?

    Interesting that the depositors appear to be getting share in the banks, for what they are worth, in return.

    I wonder if National Savings and Investments would be similarly hit if it were the UK? Apparent safe haven that it is meant to be:think:
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    edited 17 March 2013 at 12:33AM
    If you put £1,000 into a Lloyds savings account, it would be covered by the FSCS.

    You are talking about people not understanding things, but people are led to believe that they are covered. If they are not, or cover is removed, that's a different scenario.

    People in this country often realise the risk of savings accounts and split their savings with several banks.

    Sorry you're confusing different risks. How are people led to believe that FSCS protects them against changes in tax and legislation? It just protects depositors if a bank is unable to meet it's obligations.

    Splitting savings isn't intended to mitigate against the risk of tax and legislative changes.

    If people thought they were 'covered' i.e. risk free then they were wrong.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Interesting that the depositors appear to be getting share in the banks, for what they are worth, in return.

    Personally I wouldn't be happy if I banked with RBS to find one morning 6.75% of my money had been taken. In exchange I held RBS shares.....

    The Germans were raising issues regarding the plan in January. Have they reached the point of no more? Banks should go bust rather than merely storing up problems for the future.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Personally I wouldn't be happy if I banked with RBS to find one morning 6.75% of my money had been taken. In exchange I held RBS shares.....

    The Germans were raising issues regarding the plan in January. Have they reached the point of no more? Banks should go bust rather than merely storing up problems for the future.


    Yes I made the point about the Germans (think I got away with it) earlier.

    I guess it would depend how many RBS shares you got, even after dilution, better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    It's not like shares. The risk is different.

    My point to you (and you always do this - prime example being "people should buy if they dont want to pay high rents) is that you assume that everyone has thousands, making it worth actually investing in shares. People don't. Many many people simply have a small amount of savings. Hence why savings and investments can never be the same thing.

    I think we basically agree. Shares have risks; deposits have risks - just different risks that's all.

    Not being able to afford shares and only having a small amount of savings changes the type and magnitude of the risk - risk is still there. In this case there doesn't seem to be a distinction made between deserving and undeserving depositors.
  • This may sound silly, but why just depositers? Why should people with mortgages/loans get away without being taxed if depositers have to? Anyone who had a loan of under/over €100,000 get's an increase in how much they have to repay?
    "Sealed Pot challenge" member No. 138

    2012 £ 3147.74 2013 £1437.532014 £ 2356.52
  • Xiderpunk
    Xiderpunk Posts: 136 Forumite
    Outrageous theft from it's own people. I hope the private citizens in Cypress are armed. Think it is time to reexamine our 'gun control' laws also.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    the FSCS..

    Yawn.

    Putting money in the bank does not in any way exempt it from a decision to increase tax.

    You seem to be muddling an awful lot of topics here Graham.

    You only need to understand one thing...

    It's a one-off tax. Removed at source from their bank accounts.

    Deposit insurance schemes are of no relevance, as they don't guard against taxation.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.