We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Carers Allowance

Options
Is it true that those who have been carers for more than 15yrs are entitled to the allowance for life even when they stop caring? Its a new one to me, but I met someone who was told they were.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Halifax, taking the Xtra since 1853:rolleyes:
~~~~~~~~~~~~

Comments

  • Own_My_Own
    Own_My_Own Posts: 6,098 Forumite
    Xmas Saver!
    I'm not expert, but from reading this article I would very much doubt it.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21432659
  • oldhand
    oldhand Posts: 3,749 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Sincerely hope not or the systems worse than I thought......:(
  • SEE
    SEE Posts: 722 Forumite
    Own_My_Own wrote: »
    I'm not expert, but from reading this article I would very much doubt it.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21432659
    Thank you for that, I hadn't read about it before. Its interesting on many levels, because people may not be able to afford to care, or want to care without the extra bit of money. They could go out to work and not ruin their own health looking after someone else. It means many thousands of pounds per month spent on people with disabilities moving into care homes instead? At least the private sector will make a killing at their expense, so nothing lost there then.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Halifax, taking the Xtra since 1853:rolleyes:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • SEE
    SEE Posts: 722 Forumite
    oldhand wrote: »
    Sincerely hope not or the systems worse than I thought......:(
    They assumed that having cared for over 15yrs and destroying their back in the process that there was a benefit for them, but as for things being worse than you thought. Surely this is far worse than someone who gives up life and career to care?
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mohamed-salim-sudan-war-criminal-1759679
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Halifax, taking the Xtra since 1853:rolleyes:
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • anmarj
    anmarj Posts: 1,826 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    this came in 2002, it may be that they are paid against these rules in which they have to satisfy a different set of rules.

    'Continuation for life' rule - implications before 28th October 2002

    Most of these changes are straightforward but the abolition of the 'continuation for life' rule means people should consider acting before October 2002. Here we explain the rule and what to do.
    The 'continuation for life' rule: Before 28 October 2002, if someone is entitled to ICA before their 65th birthday , it can continue to be paid beyond their 65th birthday. Once they have passed this age, the ICA would continue for life - even if they stop caring for that person.
    But, the 'continuation for life rule' will stop from 28th October 2002. this means that where someone makes a new claim for ICA from 28th October 2002, if that person subsequently stops caring, then the ICA will stop. It will not matter if they are under or over 65. The only concession is that the ICA will continue for 8 weeks where the cared for person has died.
    Transitional protection
    Those who got ICA before 28th October 2002 will come under the old rules i.e. If they continue to get ICA beyond their 65th birthday, they will get it for life - even if they subsequently stop caring. They will continue to satisfy the 'continuation for life' rule.
    What carers should do before 28th October 2002

    Implications for ICA:
    It is important that carers who are not on ICA consider getting this transitional protection by claiming ICA before 28th October 2002. But see 'danger' below.
    Implications for other benefits:
    This transitional protection also has implications for possible entitlement to Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit. If a person gets ICA, they may attract an increase in these benefits - called a 'carer premium'. It is presently worth £24.80 a week.
    Even more complicated is the 'overlapping benefit rule'
    ICA may not payable if it "overlaps" with another 'earnings replacement benefit'. For example a higher amount of Retirement Pension. So even though ICA may not actually be paid, there is an 'underlying entitlement' to it. And it will still attract the 'carer premium'.
    It is important that people who are carers and not claiming ICA should consider claiming it - before 28th October 2002. But see 'danger' below.
  • sheep-ali
    sheep-ali Posts: 573 Forumite
    My mother was the sole carer for my disabled brother. When she was no longer fit & someone else was doing the job, I called to inform the dwp & was told that she should not give up her carer's allowance as she was entitled to it for life even if my brother died before she did.
    I was astounded but I then discovered that my brother could not get ILA if my mother was still getting carer's allowance so we gave it up.
    A ridiculous system.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.