We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
when car value goes up
quiet_man
Posts: 3 Newbie
i was involved in a minor accident and much to surprise they decided to write the car off, the value of the car was agreed it was agreed that because the car was classed as commerical that VAT would be added to the valuation if i could produce the VAT receipt. i produced the VAT reciept and was told that was fine and i would be intitled to claim the VAT as i am not VAT registered. once they examined the VAT receipt they realised that value of my car had actually increased so they are refusing to the VAT as agreed
what can i do ?
what can i do ?
0
Comments
-
Unless you had an agreed value policy, then the write off value should be the current (pre incident) market value.
Make sure that is the basis used for your car being valued. (The price you paid for it is irrelevant)0 -
thanks thats what i said but they said that it was illigel to profit from a claim, they even said that in 99% of cases everything would have been fine but because the market value was more than i had paid they wouldnt be paying the VAT :mad: which means i am £1000 sort
contacted the finiancal ombitisman and they have raised the issue with them0 -
are you at fault for the accident? If not then claim from the insurer of the other party (assuming they accept blame) as they are not going to pull any stunts about the"insured value".0
-
I also think your insurers are wrong to rely on the price you paid. If you got an uber bargain which was never to be repeated, why should they not then pay the correct"market value" for the vehicle even if that is more than what you paid?0
-
Refer the Insurers to this which is from the Ombudsman
"We are likely to award the policyholder the full retail value, even if he/she inadvertently under-estimated the value of the vehicle when filling in the proposal form or luckily bought the vehicle for less than it was worth. And we have seen exceptional cases where a vehicle’s value genuinely rose between the date it was bought and the date of the damage/theft."
http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/motor-valuation.html
What sort of business is it and is the car insured in the company name or your name?0 -
thanks
it was a nissian navara that i use for personal use, hence why i am not VAT reg, but i had to pay when i bought the truck and yes i did get a good deal when i bought it if i had kept in garage for 2 years instead of driving it i reckon i would have made about £30000 -
Of course cars can go up in value. I bought a Volvo 240 for £100 6 years ago, ran it for 4 years and then sold it for £300. Most of my cars go up in value.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
With the drop in the pound, the prices of many imported cars have been rising. So not surprising that some used cars have also seen rises.0
-
thanks thats what i said but they said that it was illigel to profit from a claim, they even said that in 99% of cases everything would have been fine but because the market value was more than i had paid they wouldnt be paying the VAT :mad: which means i am £1000 sort
contacted the finiancal ombitisman and they have raised the issue with them
They are mixing up two things here. Paying VAT is only relevant if you are VAT registered. Your settlement should be market value (retailer).
In general it is not right to profit from a claim but some policies allow a new replacement car if a written off car is less than a year old. Technically that would mean the policyholder profits from the claim.
New for old settlement on home insurance also means that the policyholder technically profits.
If you were given the Navara, does that mean the most you could claim is £0.00? What you paid has no direct relevance to a total loss settlement.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
