We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Where do I stand?

I bought two items, A and B, to work with my PV solar system. They both work OK independently, but together, item A renders item B virtually useless. The manufacturers of item A are aware of this problem and are redesigning their product so it won't interact with item B.

Now, I don't regard my current item A as fit for purpose. It is barely a few months old. So where would I stand as regards a replacement for item A when the upgraded product is available?

Comments

  • WestonDave
    WestonDave Posts: 5,154 Forumite
    Rampant Recycler
    I think a bit more detail needed here! You'd need to start by establishing that there was some relationship between A and B such that the supplier of A,

    1) Knew you had item B
    2) Could reasonably expect that you intended item A to work alongside item B

    and supplied you item A. At that point you might have some chance.

    You can't simply say I bought a pie from Sainsbury's and a bottle of beer from Threshers and claim that as the pie and beer didn't taste right together, Sainsbury's should supply you with a new pie that did taste right with that beer.
    Adventure before Dementia!
  • Buzby
    Buzby Posts: 8,275 Forumite
    As long as they both work independently for the purpose each were designed for, there is no issue, as neither firm warranted that their item would work in association with another.

    You may find a pro installer would have been aware of the issue and should not have specified both items, but if you made the decision yourself, sell it on an auction site and recover your costs.
  • ThumbRemote
    ThumbRemote Posts: 4,752 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The Sale of Goods Act states that an item must be of satisfactory quality, which includes the "fitness for all the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied"

    You may be able to argue that Item A is not fit for the purpose of 'using in a PV system that includes item B'. So is this a common purpose, as per the act? The fact the manufacturer of Item A knows there's a problem and are working on a solution would suggest it might be.

    Personally, in the first instance I'd just try asking them if they can resolve the problem or offer you an upgrade. If not, then go in with the legal stuff. But you may need to persuade a judge of this.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.