We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Move from Cash ISA to S&S ISA for a better return?

jabbahut40
jabbahut40 Posts: 222 Forumite
edited 25 February 2013 at 9:34PM in Savings & investments
Hi,

I have £40K in cash ISAs between myself and my wife. We have no mortgage and have 6 months emergency funds in a savings account. In recognition that interest rates are so poor (and effectively eroding our capital due to inflation) I was wondering whether there are any thoughts on what S&S funds I could consider to invest to bet inflation, taking low/medium risk with a view to invest for 5 years.

Thoughts welcomed.

Jabba

Ps - I've already got S&S ISAs from previous years which has £16K invested across various high risk active funds.

Comments

  • BLB53
    BLB53 Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    You could have a look at investment trusts - whether you would consider these to be low/medium risk I don't know but I have been holding ITs for income for many years and they have served me very well.

    If they may be of interest, here's an article on RIT last month which you might find useful.
    http://www.retirementinvestingtoday.com/2013/01/investing-for-income-via-investment.html
    We have a climate emergency and need to re-think investing strategies to avoid sectors that are part of the problem such as oil & gas and embrace climate-friendly options such as renewable energy.
  • BLB53 wrote: »
    You could have a look at investment trusts - whether you would consider these to be low/medium risk I don't know but I have been holding ITs for income for many years and they have served me very well.

    If they may be of interest, here's an article on RIT last month which you might find useful.
    http://www.retirementinvestingtoday.com/2013/01/investing-for-income-via-investment.html

    Thanks BLB53. Is there any different between ITs and other income funds other than generally lower charges?

    Jabba
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,845 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    jabbahut40 wrote: »
    Thanks BLB53. Is there any different between ITs and other income funds other than generally lower charges?

    Jabba

    The lower charges for ITs is probably not valid any more with the advent of RDR.
  • BLB53 wrote: »
    You could have a look at investment trusts - whether you would consider these to be low/medium risk I don't know

    actually its fall into the same range of safe to volatile as uts,etfs or plain old equities - so there'snot much difference really

    reits oth must pay out a high %ge which in itself is a risk

    my advice - vanguard lifestrategy fund or you own blend of cheap trackers in the classic equities/bonds mix 60/40 maybe

    or ftse100 with yld 3-5% divi cover at least 2x low debt increasing divi for last 5 years

    dealin chunks of £2000 to keep costs down if buying shares

    funds may be free -depends on platform

    goodluck

    fj
  • BLB53
    BLB53 Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Is there any different between ITs and other income funds other than generally lower charges?
    If you are interested in an income, ITs are more steady and predictable and churn out a rising quarterly dividend - whereas funds can be a bit lumpy as they can't hold back income in good years to smooth payouts.

    Also I don't trust fund managers with hidden charges like soft commissions (see Telegraph article today) - they suggest what you pay for funds is not 1.5% but more like 3%.

    Of course this might equally apply to ITs but I have not come across it.

    Charges for the likes of City of London are around 0.4% and yield 4.4% at current prices.

    Vanguard LS funds are cheaper but then theres the platform charges eg £2 per month per fund with HL or £12.50 qtr with Sippdeal.

    Shares could be another option - again a good article on RIT in January if this might be of interest.
    We have a climate emergency and need to re-think investing strategies to avoid sectors that are part of the problem such as oil & gas and embrace climate-friendly options such as renewable energy.
  • Have a look at bonds which pay a good 4/5%, im invested into 2 bonds via HL which pay 6% and 9% respectively but some might consider these higher risk (both have done well over the last few yrs iv held them).

    Alternatively Blackrock trackers via HL are lower costs than funds c0.5% but you probably wont get the big 10%+ annual gains you do with some funds
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.