We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Property at Auction

124»

Comments

  • At least you can deduct the deposit (if any exist) from the rent arrears you will have to pay the seller. You won't have to return the deposit because there is unpaid rent.
  • N79
    N79 Posts: 2,615 Forumite
    koradma wrote: »
    We confirmed the signature on the AST was the T's verbally in person. Is this sufficient ?

    No idea - ask your solicitor. My comment was simply aimed at making sure you are confident that the tenancy is an AST and that the T won't suddenly turn round and say "I've lived here since 1973 and don't recognise that piece of paper" which would be a disaster.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,828 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    koradma wrote: »
    Am not clear what you mean by this. We have asked the tenant to provide proof of any rents or deposits they have paid. None have been provided even though they claim the council paid the LL 1k in deposit. Not corroborated by any evidence.

    If she did pay a deposit would we be liable, to be honest she owes us 6k in rent arrears anyways.

    Is there a point I am missing here?

    Yes, you can't successfully bring eviction proceedings unless the deposit was placed in one of th schemes AND the tenant was given the appropriate documentation. In order to evict, you may have to give the deposit back. The one the current owner says does not exist.

    Councils quite often give an indemnity for one month's rent, rather than handing over cash. I'm not clear whether a 3rd party deposit needs to be protected in the same way as one from the tenant.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • tim123456789
    tim123456789 Posts: 1,787 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 28 February 2013 at 12:52PM
    koradma wrote: »
    Am not clear what you mean by this. We have asked the tenant to provide proof of any rents or deposits they have paid. None have been provided even though they claim the council paid the LL 1k in deposit. Not corroborated by any evidence.

    If she did pay a deposit would we be liable, to be honest she owes us 6k in rent arrears anyways.

    Is there a point I am missing here?

    You are liable for the original deposit and its ongouing protection.

    The seller should pass it on to you otherwise you will have to fund it out of your own pocket.

    You can set the unpaid rent against it when T eventually leaves, but that's no use to you if it was your money in the first place.

    IMHO the vendor is trying to pull a fast one here. Insist that they prove the rent arrears exist or you wont pay them. (You will, of course, need this proof to evict)

    tim
  • N79 wrote: »
    No idea - ask your solicitor. My comment was simply aimed at making sure you are confident that the tenancy is an AST and that the T won't suddenly turn round and say "I've lived here since 1973 and don't recognise that piece of paper" which would be a disaster.

    If he's evicting based upon 6 months arrears, it wont make much difference
  • N79
    N79 Posts: 2,615 Forumite
    If he's evicting based upon 6 months arrears, it wont make much difference

    It could do, as rent arrears are only a discretionary ground for eviction if its a rent act tenancy. Like I said, it pays to be certain of the type of tenancy when buying at auction and not to take a piece of paper at face value.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.