We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.

How long can a shop wait before charging me for an item?

I recently sent a faulty electrical item back to a shop. The item was still in warranty, and the shop told me it was unrepairable and therefore they would replace it or I could choose another item and put the value of the original item towards it.

I chose the latter option, and when I ordered my new item, I received conflicting messages from the shop over the value of the item I had returned, and therefore whether I owed them money or they owed me a partial refund (though my suspicion is that I owe them money).

The item has since been delivered, and the shop said someone would be in touch with me soon to arrange the settlement of the balance, but I have heard nothing from them.

Obviously I am reluctant to contact them as I suspect I owe them money, and at any rate they said explicitly that they would contact me. The question I have is whether I would be within my rights to demand some sort of redress in the event that the shop were to contact me several months down the line to demand payment? If I owe them money, can they demand payment at any time or is there a time limit on what is deemed a reasonable period within which to do so?

Thanks all!

Comments

  • Under contract law the statute of limitations is 6 years (or 5 in Scotland iirc).

    What sort of redress do you think you would be due for not paying someone money you owe them?
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • What sort of redress do you think you would be due for not paying someone money you owe them?

    Well in an extreme hypothetical case, I think you would have a right to be at least a little bit irritated if a company contacted you 5 years after you purchased something to tell you that they charged you the wrong amount 5 years earlier, whether or not they are correct in saying so.
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    H57454 wrote: »
    Well in an extreme hypothetical case, I think you would have a right to be at least a little bit irritated if a company contacted you 5 years after you purchased something to tell you that they charged you the wrong amount 5 years earlier, whether or not they are correct in saying so.

    So what sort of redress do you think you would be due? What are your losses as a result of being irritated?
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    H57454 wrote: »
    Well in an extreme hypothetical case, I think you would have a right to be at least a little bit irritated if a company contacted you 5 years after you purchased something to tell you that they charged you the wrong amount 5 years earlier, whether or not they are correct in saying so.

    I imagine they might be a little bit irritated you didnt contact them to remind them that the matter was unresolved.

    And we're not saying money would still be owing after 5-6 years, just that it is the statute of limitations. But say for instance, you agree to buy item x @ £100 and the retailer mistakenly doesnt take payment or only takes partial payment....they're still entitled to the rest because that is what is contracted.

    There are also circumstances where the retailer might lose that entitlement, say if the company had previously told the customer it was ok, it was their mistake and wouldnt be taking any further payment etc
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • H57454 wrote: »
    Well in an extreme hypothetical case, I think you would have a right to be at least a little bit irritated if a company contacted you 5 years after you purchased something to tell you that they charged you the wrong amount 5 years earlier, whether or not they are correct in saying so.

    Irritated - yes, financial redress - no.

    Count yourself lucky, 5 years later that amount of money has been inflated to be worth significantly less when the transaction took place.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • ThumbRemote
    ThumbRemote Posts: 4,758 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It would help to know a little about the actual costs of the item. If there is a possibility the balance could go either way, it sounds like there isn't a major amount payable whatever way it goes.

    It may just be that the amount is so small it's not worth them chasing.
  • Post them a cheque now..and avoid being irritated in the future if that's what concerns you. That could may be an answer?
  • The sensible thing to do would be to contact them, rather than risk them chasing you in the future.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.