We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Cost of Replacing Door

Hello,

Aplogies if this is in the wrong place.

I own a property that I let out (and I have landlord insurance). A few days ago, the police executed a search warrant (looking for drugs) but didn't find any. To gain access to the property, the door was rammed open and now needs replaced.

The police say they aren't liable for the damage and my insurance company wont pay up either. Am I really liable to pay for it even if they didn't find anything?

Thanks,
CR

Comments

  • HappyMJ
    HappyMJ Posts: 21,115 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The tenant would be liable if they are found guilty of an offence.

    The police would be liable if they found nothing.

    You need to bring a civil claim against the police.
    :footie:
    :p Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S) :p Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money. :p
  • HappyMJ wrote: »
    The tenant would be liable if they are found guilty of an offence.

    The police would be liable if they found nothing.

    You need to bring a civil claim against the police.

    There is no legal obligation for the police to provide compensation for damage caused provided that the raid was legally carried out and they didn't use excessive force or cause excessive damage even if no illegal goods were found.
  • Shelldean
    Shelldean Posts: 2,446 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There is no legal obligation for the police to provide compensation for damage caused provided that the raid was legally carried out and they didn't use excessive force or cause excessive damage even if no illegal goods were found.

    I agree with this comment.

    We had damage done by the police to our property through no fault of our own and couldn't get them to compensate us for the loss.

    We live in a terrace and they police were chasing a criminal across the gardens. Crim hopped over our fence but the police officer managed to lunge at fence to grab himjust before he landed. ( we was watching awakened by the noise) The force of the officers lunge caused the fence panel to fall. Unfortunatly kids toys were under the fallen panel, and with the weight of the officer, criminal and fence panel were ruined. We even got dressed and let the officer walk the bloke thru the house ( he'd have had to get over at least 3 fences otherwise) didn't even get a thank you for that!!!!!!

    think it was three toys ruined, but no one would help us replace them even though it was nothing to do withus.
  • bris
    bris Posts: 10,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There is no legal obligation for the police to provide compensation for damage caused provided that the raid was legally carried out and they didn't use excessive force or cause excessive damage even if no illegal goods were found.
    Shelldean wrote: »
    I agree with this comment.

    We had damage done by the police to our property through no fault of our own and couldn't get them to compensate us for the loss.

    We live in a terrace and they police were chasing a criminal across the gardens. Crim hopped over our fence but the police officer managed to lunge at fence to grab himjust before he landed. ( we was watching awakened by the noise) The force of the officers lunge caused the fence panel to fall. Unfortunatly kids toys were under the fallen panel, and with the weight of the officer, criminal and fence panel were ruined. We even got dressed and let the officer walk the bloke thru the house ( he'd have had to get over at least 3 fences otherwise) didn't even get a thank you for that!!!!!!

    think it was three toys ruined, but no one would help us replace them even though it was nothing to do withus.
    Agree all you want but you would be wrong, the police are liable and need to put it right, they will of course deny liability it is their first line of defence to make you go away. There is a large thread on this over at landlord zone, here is a quick find on police paying for repairs on a similar raid http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100regionalnews/2008/02/16/police-sorry-we-thought-your-boiler-was-a-cannabis-factory-50061-20484259/#story_continue

    It also happened to me a few years ago when a Chinese cannabis farm was found on one of my properties. I asked at the time if they would put it right but was told because a crime was committed they weren't liable, if no crime they are.
  • shaun_from_Africa
    shaun_from_Africa Posts: 12,858 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 11 February 2013 at 9:16PM
    From the UK Government
    Constituents sometimes ask whether they can get compensation for damage (for example to a front door) following forced entry by the police.
    Police forces do sometimes make ex gratia payments or pay compensation following such damage, for example where the raid was at the wrong premises. However, statutory guidance states that compensation for such damage is "unlikely to be appropriate if the search was lawful, and the force used can be shown to be reasonable, proportionate and necessary to effect entry." Where a police force refuses to make such a payment, then a constituent wishing to pursue the matter further would need to obtain specialist legal advice

    www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN05524.pdf

    This is further backed up by PACE (Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 B6)


    Whether compensation is appropriate depends on the circumstances in each case.

    Compensation for damage caused when effecting entry is unlikely to be appropriate if the search was lawful, and the force used can be shown to be reasonable, proportionate and necessary to effect entry. If the wrong premises are searched bymistake everything possible should be done at the earliest opportunity to allay any
    sense of grievance and there should normally be a strong presumption in favour ofpaying compensation.







  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    HappyMJ wrote: »
    The tenant would be liable if they are found guilty of an offence.

    The police would be liable if they found nothing.

    You need to bring a civil claim against the police.
    Care to back that up with some documented facts please?
  • A couple of years ago, the police carried out a raid on the building used by the scout troop where my son was a member (they stated that they believed it was being used to store drugs!).

    Nothing was found and they did pay for the door to be replaced, but they made it clear that this was not in any way an admission that they had done anything wrong and that the payment was an
    ex-gratia payment.


  • Hi, Thanks for all the comments. I'm just going to focus on getting the door fixed and then make a case that the police should pay and hopefully they'll be kind and make an ex-gratia payment.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,660 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    This is something from the house of commons on the matter:

    INFO


    I would start by asking the police for all their evidence showing that drugs were on the premises, and make them prove that their entry was lawful and justified.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • Nukumai
    Nukumai Posts: 278 Forumite
    pinkshoes wrote: »
    ...make them prove that their entry was lawful and justified.

    And, equally, "proportionate and necessary to effect entry" (PACE)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.