We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tenants won't leave but it's not my property...yet.

2»

Comments

  • Kynthia
    Kynthia Posts: 5,692 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Have you checked out what the legal position is re supply of services - gas, electric, water to this flat. As there are no tenants living in it any longer (well - there SHOULDNT be/how could there be? - with the fact they were due out before now) then couldnt one of you say "The flat is empty now - so it doesnt need its services - cut them off".

    In England this is attempting an illegal eviction and is a criminal offense.
    If the law doesnt allow that and those tenants are the sort of people who want to have cake and eat it - by squatting on the one hand but demanding services
    still be supplied on the other hand.

    They aren't squatting as they have a tenancy. If they did end the tenancy they still aren't squatters and can only be evicted by a court order and court bailiffs.

    I guess we don't really know what the teanants actually signed as the landlord could be saying whatever you wanted to hear when buying.
    Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!
  • sequence
    sequence Posts: 1,877 Forumite
    Guess you have to keep up the pressure on the current owner of your flat to get those tenants out.

    Have you checked out what the legal position is re supply of services - gas, electric, water to this flat. As there are no tenants living in it any longer (well - there SHOULDNT be/how could there be? - with the fact they were due out before now) then couldnt one of you say "The flat is empty now - so it doesnt need its services - cut them off".

    This is where I say "check it out" as to whether you or the current owner can cut off those services on the grounds that the flat is now empty (even though it isnt - because they are squatting there illegally in effect).

    If the law doesnt allow that and those tenants are the sort of people who want to have cake and eat it - by squatting on the one hand but demanding services still be supplied on the other hand - then I guess its up to the current owner of the flat to pay for his over-optimistic mistake and bribe them out (I expect thats what they are waiting for....:(). I would be pointing out to him that he had two choices - bribe those squatters out or pay me compensation for not having given me vacant possession of my flat as per promise and that it was going to cost him either way.

    The above poster should be ignored, as he/she clearly as no understanding of anything mentioned in this thread. I think you'll find it's the landlord who wants their cake and to eat it. If you want to sell your house- evict the tenants *first*. Taking rent money and trying to evict them on a whim is wrong. The tenants are paying rent for their home. They are not and won't ever be squatters.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.