We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Is Banking Really 'free' as they claim?

123457»

Comments

  • cepheus
    cepheus Posts: 20,053 Forumite
    edited 4 February 2013 at 3:19PM
    Linton wrote: »
    Dunfermline was a genuine Building Society as was Derbyshire which got taken over by Nationwide. I dont know why they failed.
    On 28 March 2009, reports indicated the building society was no longer viable, toxic assets would be stripped out and the remaining business put up for public sale.[2]

    "Forced sale of building society". BBC News Online. 2009-03-28
    Seems the only difference with the Banks, was they were not to big to fail (or be taken over), so Building Societies were not necessarily 'safe' either
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,536 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    cepheus wrote: »
    Seems the only difference with the Banks, was they were not to big to fail (or be taken over), so Building Societies were not necessarily 'safe' either


    Dunfermline failed partly because of bad loans for commercial property. Also it bought mortgage-backed assets which fell significantly in value from other financial companies including Lehmans. They also lost money developing software. From the same source, building societies can borrow up to 50% of their capital from the money markets, banks have no limit. So yes, when building societies started dabbling in things they didnt understand and doing business beyond their experience they came a cropper as well.
  • cepheus
    cepheus Posts: 20,053 Forumite
    edited 5 February 2013 at 9:41AM
    Linton wrote: »
    Dunfermline failed partly because of bad loans for commercial property. Also it bought mortgage-backed assets which fell significantly in value from other financial companies including Lehmans. They also lost money developing software. From the same source, building societies can borrow up to 50% of their capital from the money markets, banks have no limit. So yes, when building societies started dabbling in things they didnt understand and doing business beyond their experience they came a cropper as well.

    As mentioned earlier though, the problem is that this ring fencing process wouldn't have saved Northern Rock at all. What we really want to separate is all non-box standard financial stuff and redefine it as speculative risky investment. Either that or we simply can't trust these to operate as public shareholding companies.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.