We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is Banking Really 'free' as they claim?
Comments
-
Dunfermline was a genuine Building Society as was Derbyshire which got taken over by Nationwide. I dont know why they failed.
Seems the only difference with the Banks, was they were not to big to fail (or be taken over), so Building Societies were not necessarily 'safe' eitherOn 28 March 2009, reports indicated the building society was no longer viable, toxic assets would be stripped out and the remaining business put up for public sale.[2]
"Forced sale of building society". BBC News Online. 2009-03-280 -
Seems the only difference with the Banks, was they were not to big to fail (or be taken over), so Building Societies were not necessarily 'safe' either
Dunfermline failed partly because of bad loans for commercial property. Also it bought mortgage-backed assets which fell significantly in value from other financial companies including Lehmans. They also lost money developing software. From the same source, building societies can borrow up to 50% of their capital from the money markets, banks have no limit. So yes, when building societies started dabbling in things they didnt understand and doing business beyond their experience they came a cropper as well.0 -
Dunfermline failed partly because of bad loans for commercial property. Also it bought mortgage-backed assets which fell significantly in value from other financial companies including Lehmans. They also lost money developing software. From the same source, building societies can borrow up to 50% of their capital from the money markets, banks have no limit. So yes, when building societies started dabbling in things they didnt understand and doing business beyond their experience they came a cropper as well.
As mentioned earlier though, the problem is that this ring fencing process wouldn't have saved Northern Rock at all. What we really want to separate is all non-box standard financial stuff and redefine it as speculative risky investment. Either that or we simply can't trust these to operate as public shareholding companies.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards