We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Reclaiming Bank Charges if I'm no longer in Financial Difficulty
Ryanreid
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi, I wonder if someone could give me some advice very quickly.
I've been charged a fortune over the years in Bank Charges, most notably when I was a student. I now have a job, and am no longer in what I would class as financial difficulty, although I'm by no means rolling in it!
There seems to be a lot on here about financial hardship, and I was wondering if it would be worth my while trying to reclaim my charges now?
Sorry, don't have time to read through all the posts on here, any help would be appreciated.
Now, back to work!
I've been charged a fortune over the years in Bank Charges, most notably when I was a student. I now have a job, and am no longer in what I would class as financial difficulty, although I'm by no means rolling in it!
There seems to be a lot on here about financial hardship, and I was wondering if it would be worth my while trying to reclaim my charges now?
Sorry, don't have time to read through all the posts on here, any help would be appreciated.
Now, back to work!
0
Comments
-
I'm with the Clydesdale bank, if that makes any difference.0
-
No, no point at all. You cannot claim historically.
Now back to work again. lolmake the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
and we will never, ever return.0 -
Can you please tell me the source of your information for your specifying that financial hardship claims can not be made if you are no longer in financial hardship?
In my opinion, if someone was in financial hardship in 2008 (say, on benefits) and incurred lots of £35 charges, I believe the spirit of the law relating to financial hardship has not been broken by making a claim - in any way.
Definitive legal source, please?
Thanks from Goldie.0 -
No, no point at all. You cannot claim historically.
Now back to work again. lol
Can you please tell me the source of your information for your specifying that financial hardship claims can not be made if you are no longer in financial hardship?
In my opinion, if someone was in financial hardship in 2008 (say, on benefits) and incurred lots of £35 charges, I believe the spirit of the law relating to financial hardship has not been broken by making a claim - in any way.
Definitive legal source, please?
Thanks from Goldie.0 -
There is no legal source. It's banks goodwill when they agree to refund financial hardship cases.
If you were in financial hardship years ago, then the time to claim was then, not now. The banks are wise to people now apparently claiming to have been in financial difficulty years ago. It's mainly people jumping on the "claim everything you think you can" bandwagon.
Any sensible person wouldn't have waited years to contact their bank for help would they ? They would have asked when they needed it.0 -
Goldie4711 wrote: »......the spirit of the law relating to financial hardship......Definitive legal source, please?
There is no statutory right to 'financial hardship' claims. It is a goodwill gesture of the bank to help those who are financially at sea to reach terra firma again. Typical financial hardship settlement would be a refund of the charges for the last six month and a stop on new charges for the next three months. Enough to enable the claimant in question to sort-out his/her financial affairs.
Financial hardship can only be temporary by it's nature, not permanently. If you have fallen on hard times (for whatever reason), you might have initial difficulties to scale down your previously comfortable life style, to one that confirms to the new reduced income. If after a reasonable time you have been unable to cut your coat according to your available cloth, you have nobody but yourself to blame. That is the reason why a financial hardship claim will scrutinize your current spending habits. If you spend money on things that are considered 'frivolous', your hardship claim is likely to fail.
You cannot go on forever and ever to spend more than you have coming in.0 -
1 - The legal sources are detailed in Martin Lewis' Guide to reclaiming.There is no legal source. It's banks goodwill when they agree to refund financial hardship cases.
If you were in financial hardship years ago, then the time to claim was then, not now. The banks are wise to people now apparently claiming to have been in financial difficulty years ago. It's mainly people jumping on the "claim everything you think you can" bandwagon.
Any sensible person wouldn't have waited years to contact their bank for help would they ? They would have asked when they needed it.
2 - With all respect, any sensible person can't see into the future, can they? - (The Lending Code legislation is very recent - from 2011) .
3 - Also, I'm not trying to "rip off" the banks, as you imply - I was in genuine financial hardship for nearly 10 years on benefits.
Let's agree to disagree and I thank you for your response.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Thanks. Goldie0 -
Is their a reason why you did not claim them whilst you was in financial difficulty?
The best thing to do is attempt to claim them back under financial hardship, then when the bank tell you take a long run and jump take the concern to the FOS if you think you have a case.Im an ex employee RBS GroupHowever Any Opinion Given On MSE Is Strictly My Own0 -
Is their a reason why you did not claim them whilst you was in financial difficulty?
The best thing to do is attempt to claim them back under financial hardship, then when the bank tell you take a long run and jump take the concern to the FOS if you think you have a case.
Yes. the reason I didn't claim in 2003 was that the provisions for financial hardship only came into force in 2009 (Banking Code) and 2011 (Lending Code).
I am certain I have a case. Thanks for your reply.0 -
Thanks for the response. I have barely been able to feed myself for a decade on £120 / fortnight -so there's no issue of "frivolous expenditure" on my bank statements.bengal-stripe wrote: »Typical financial hardship settlement would be a refund of the charges for the last six month and a stop on new charges for the next three months. Enough to enable the claimant in question to sort-out his/her financial affairs.........
That is the reason why a financial hardship claim will scrutinize your current spending habits. If you spend money on things that are considered 'frivolous', your hardship claim is likely to fail.
When you say "typical settlement", do you mean it's done on a case by case basis and (more importantly) that there is no legal provision for length in years (mine would be 10 years) of financial hardship, which forms the basis of a claim?
Thanks,
Goldie.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards