We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Tories deliberately made unpopular so as to keep Wallace in?

13»

Comments

  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A week is a long time in politics, let alone two years.

    Remember Kinnock ?

    Fair enough but it is a bit previous to say that Labour are cacking it :)
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • GeorgeHowell
    GeorgeHowell Posts: 2,739 Forumite
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Fair enough but it is a bit previous to say that Labour are cacking it :)

    Can't speak for the person who first said it, but I am basing that judgment on Milliband's pathetic performnace at PMQs.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    StevieJ wrote: »
    Why do they need to lure voters back?
    http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/
    Oppositions always do well in mid-term polls. Generally they don't win the election unless they are 20+ points ahead mid-term, look at the historic polling records on that site. Where oppositions are only 10 points ahead mid-term they don't usually win the next election. Tories had 10-20 point leads in 2008 and failed to win outright in 2010, Kinnock had 20+ point leads in 1990 and didn't win.

    Last time Labour won from opposition in 1997 they had 30+ point leads mid term, they were polling in the high 50's and even 60's!
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Can't speak for the person who first said it, but I am basing that judgment on Milliband's pathetic performnace at PMQs.

    Short memory there icon7.gif interesting choice of phrase as well
    You can bet Labour are cacking at the moment.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    zagfles wrote: »
    Oppositions always do well in mid-term polls. Generally they don't win the election unless they are 20+ points ahead mid-term, look at the historic polling records on that site. Where oppositions are only 10 points ahead mid-term they don't usually win the next election. Tories had 10-20 point leads in 2008 and failed to win outright in 2010, Kinnock had 20+ point leads in 1990 and didn't win.

    Last time Labour won from opposition in 1997 they had 30+ point leads mid term, they were polling in the high 50's and even 60's!

    The point is Cameron's desperate last throw of the dice has not moved the polls one jot, the bottom line is that voters are conservative (with that small c) and like you say about mid-term polls turning around in elections the same is true when voters faced with a major change like leaving the EU.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • StevieJ wrote: »
    The point is Cameron's desperate last throw of the dice has not moved the polls one jot, the bottom line is that voters are conservative (with that small c) and like you say about mid-term polls turning around in elections the same is true when voters faced with a major change like leaving the EU.

    You're clinging on to that desperate straw because you need to. But mid term polls are not indicative and the effect of the EU game changer will be a slow burner because the majority don't know their a**e from their elbow on it yet.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    StevieJ wrote: »
    The point is Cameron's desperate last throw of the dice has not moved the polls one jot, the bottom line is that voters are conservative (with that small c) and like you say about mid-term polls turning around in elections the same is true when voters faced with a major change like leaving the EU.
    These things don't usually have an immediate impact - not that I'd expect this to have a great impact anyway, it's probably more to do with shutting his back-benchers up rather than trying to win votes.
  • GeorgeHowell
    GeorgeHowell Posts: 2,739 Forumite
    zagfles wrote: »
    These things don't usually have an immediate impact - not that I'd expect this to have a great impact anyway, it's probably more to do with shutting his back-benchers up rather than trying to win votes.

    That will have an indirectly beneficial effect on votes because voters hate to see divided parties.
    No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions. He had money as well.

    The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    Margaret Thatcher
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.