We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

if someone dies are the next of kin still tied to an 18 month contract

2»

Comments

  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A service contract does end on the death of either party.
    Regardless of what the contract says.
    Be happy...;)
  • railbuff
    railbuff Posts: 430 Forumite
    "Bailiffs sent to deceased's property to recover debt"

    this happened to use when my grandma passed and BT would not believe it, no matter how much they were told, they sent bailiffs, who wanted to serve on her, so we obliged and gave them her plaque location at local crematorium, so they could server it on her.

    strange never heard anything more.
  • Techhead wrote: »
    I don't think you are right about some of that. A contract doesn't automatically become null and avoid when a person dies. (Especially for provision of a service) It all depends what the contract says and who it's between. Also there may be a claim against the estate.

    An example, you would not expect a power supplier to cut the property off when the person paying dies. So there is provision to continue the contract whilst another person takes over.

    To take your example 'Phone company leaves widow unable to call for help in winter weather'

    But that is entirely different though ... in that case the service IS required/wanted, and a new contract would be drawn up in the name of the person taking over, and bank details etc would change (unless it's a joint account that transferred to the surviving partner).

    the OP, and I were referring to a service which isn't wanted anymore ... and don't feel obliged to carry it on - and will flatly refuse to continue to pay, or indeed incur any cancellation charges.
  • bod1467
    bod1467 Posts: 15,214 Forumite
    Surely someone needs to pay for the service whilst it is still being used?

    Did the OP raise the question in this forum using that internet service? If yes then (IMO) they are liable for the costs of the service until it is cancelled. I agree, however, that they are probably NOT liable for any contract cancellation charges.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.