We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Historical rise in benefits
mumps
Posts: 6,285 Forumite
Hi
I have googled this but can't quite find what I am looking for so I am hoping someone can help me. I am trying to help someone and need some figures so could anyone point me to the percentage increase in benefits for the last 20 years. Thanks in advance.
I have googled this but can't quite find what I am looking for so I am hoping someone can help me. I am trying to help someone and need some figures so could anyone point me to the percentage increase in benefits for the last 20 years. Thanks in advance.
Sell £1500
2831.00/£1500
2831.00/£1500
0
Comments
-
look for the rate of RPI in september for each year,that was used to increase benefits until this year0
-
For the past decade under Labour it has risen at double the rate of normal wage increases just so that Labour voting pool have the motivation to get up and go to the voting booth.0
-
-
Percentage of GDP spent on benefits...?0
-
-
this really isnt the place for a political argument,however i will say this and no more,is it right that jsa which is now £71 a week will by 2016 only be £73 per week?really?0
-
this really isnt the place for a political argument,however i will say this and no more,is it right that jsa which is now £71 a week will by 2016 only be £73 per week?really?
Plus rent and CT. People who work have had 0% increases recently plus rental increases.
Though I have huge sympathy for JSA only claimants - when workers who pay that benefit are feeling the pinch and not getting pay rises why should they? Very few are unemployed for 2 years plus.0 -
http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/monitoring-poverty-2012
might be of interest0 -
paddedjohn wrote: »No, it's why the Tories are rewarding those who have been paying the bills for the last umpteen years by showing will help genuine cases but not the scroungers.
You mean they are going to reward those hard working firemen, soldiers, nurses, teachers, etc, etc, by limiting their pay increases to one percent for the next three years and so effectively cutting their income in real terms?
Or like those hard working strivers who are in receipt of the New Minimum Wage? Their pay has increased by less than the rate of inflation for the past three years so they too have been toiling for less and less.
Those in receipt of state benefits (and there's an awful lot of them - 85% of UK households) have, with the exception of Child Benefit recipients, kept pace with inflation (at least the CPI measure of it) but haven't become richer per se.
This dog eat dog, pitting the poor versus the poorer attitude around here which is so prevalent amongst the chronically stupid contributors is disheartening to put it mildly.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards